DS has always been a fussy eater and I've never let it get to me too much - I know he won't starve - but now it seems to be getting worse and I'm getting a bit fed up. So here's the dilemna:
Do you a)cater to the fussy eater's wishes and just let him eat peanut butter sandwiches or scrambled egg for dinner every night or do you b)keep trying to expose him to a wide range of foods and hope that ends up getting enough to eat.
He will of course eat things like fish fingers & chicken nuggets along with plain pasta (no sauce), some fruit & veg & some types of soup. But he will not touch any fresh fish, meat, chicken, sauces, baked beans and has recently added peas, sweetcorn and chips(!) to the list of things he used to like but will no longer eat. His sister is such a good eater (salmon, lemon sole, chicken legs, chicken stir fry, shepherd's pie, bolognaise, jacket potatoes with beans, tuna & sweetcorn etc, etc) that it's really begining to frustrate me.
I've always been of the opinion that if you keep exposing them to a wide variety of foods and ask them to taste very small portions of things they will eventually learn to eat more things. He's just getting worse. Whatever I make for him he wants "something else". So do I give him whatever is for dinner (even if it's a scaled down version of what hi sister is eating) and tell him that's all that's on offer and if he doesn't eat it he'll be hungry. Or do I just give in and let him eat peanut butter on toast every night. The problem is that if he knows he's going to be offered a second option he has absolutely no incentive to eat the first one.