Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Food/recipes

For related content, visit our food content hub.

Who has breastfed exclusively for 6 months?

80 replies

Spod · 11/03/2004 12:50

I was wondering, with the current advice being that breastfed babies should not start solids till 6 months....yet plenty of people tell me that they start weaning at 4 months. My HV told me yesterday that very few people manage to exclusively breastfeed. I am constantly being told that I should start my dd on solids now (reasons to include 'shes such a big baby' and 'she'll sleep longer at night' but i really want to wait till 6 months. What experiences have you all had... if you started at 6 months or earlier, what were you reasons, how did it go and what did you feed for the first few weeks?

OP posts:
papillon · 11/03/2004 13:00

If you want to wait - the wait!!
My baby is 4.5 months and I will wait until six months. She is showing great interest in watching me eat now. Waiting is supposed to reduce the chances of allergies apparently A friend of mine waited till six months no problems.

My sister has a big baby and tried apple sauce with her baby at 4 months. The tongue reflex things seemed to spit most of it out. She did not sleep more at night either.
Dr Sears (askdrsears.com) says that trying to feed a baby more before sleep does not make it sleep longer.

musica · 11/03/2004 13:05

We have. Dd was exlusively breast fed until 25 weeks, which was about 10 days short of the 6 months. She was 14 days late, which may or may not be significant! What we found was that whereas ds, who started solids at 4 months, was always difficult to get to eat, dd was really ready for food. She had started to get a bit grumpy, had stopped sleeping through etc. But she was SO happy to get solid food and eats very well. She's 7 months now and eats pureed fruit, veg, cauliflower cheese etc. yoghurt, baby cereal, baby rice, and has breast milk to drink.

The only thing I would say that has been difficult with her is that she will NOT take a bottle. So it is very hard to leave her with anyone. At nursery she has a very small amount of EBM (prob. only 2oz in a day though), so it might be worth getting your baby used to a bottle.

I don't think the size of the baby is a good indicator - it doesn't change their digestive system.

On the whole, I think the baby tells you when they're ready - dd certainly did.

Just saw your question - what were your reasons - well partly because of the recommendations, and partly, I have to confess, because of pig-headedness after ds never really got breast feeding sorted, and was on mixed feeding throughout, I wanted to prove I could do it, and also because the HV made the same sorts of comments to me. And I'm just a stubborn sort of person!

mears · 11/03/2004 13:06

I was determined to feed baby number 4 till 6 months. It was an eye opener because I started solids with the others (earliest 20weeks, latest 23 weeks) because they started feeding more frequently during the night. Babe no.3 did not sleep all night until 8 months, despite solids.
Anyway, what I discovered was that after a few nights of more frequent feeds, it settled back down again. You can feed exclusively until 6 months - just be determined. My HV was the same and said that dd would never go easily onto solids if I left it too long. She had no problems taking them and we could miss out tasteless baby rice and go onto 'real food'. You can do it

kiwisbird · 11/03/2004 13:06

I have with both of my kids
I ignored everyone who told me to wean easrly, its up to you, if you want to just do it!
I find at 6 mths babies can eat more range straight away and mimic chewing almost straight away, whereas younger ones seem to roll it round with more coming out than in..
MY DS now aged 10 was a huge baby with massive appetite he fed every 2 hrs daily until about 7 mths, when he finally deigned to eat solids
DD was easier she was very keen at 5mths but I let her have the odd lick of anything suitable I was eating, more of a taste really... She then started breakfast at 6 mths
My first was a terrible sleeper, he was always hungry, feeding him mountians of good food didn't help!
He finally decided at 16 mths that he liked to bed down after all, when he went into bed not cot..
DD has slept like angel from birth and she eats very little and is small baby...
Bizarre

mears · 11/03/2004 13:07

By the way, youngest is 10 years old now. It has been recommended for a very long time that babies should be exclusively breastfed till 6 months. It is only recently though that it has received such publicity.

Coddy · 11/03/2004 13:08

me! Number 3

not a bottle in sight nor expressing or anything.

motherinferior · 11/03/2004 13:08

I did dd2 - well, maybe to a week short of six months. Expressing during the working week and all.

I'm a stubborn cow.

Coddy · 11/03/2004 13:08

Oh isee - did do solids though - I am disqualified now

Spod · 11/03/2004 13:15

I am gonna wait!!! dd is feeding more fequently at night again... but i prefer to see that as a normal growth spurt rather than a problem! also, if i wait till 6 months hv says she can have cows milk in her food... is this right?

OP posts:
Coddy · 11/03/2004 13:16

I always gave cows milk in food - and to drink occasionally

mumbojumbo · 11/03/2004 13:19

Talk about confusing. My HV said to go with the baby and if he was looking like he might be interested, then try baby rice etc. I spoke to a b/f counsellor yesterday who suggested I wait until 6 months.

In the end, I decided to try the baby rice this morning. DS2 is 18 weeks now, and he seemed to enjoy the experience! I will take it very slowly tho'.

wilbur · 11/03/2004 13:20

Stick to what you want to do, definitely! When I had ds, I was advised to b/f exclusively until he was weaned, which at that time was suggested from 4 months onwards. I did a bit of research into allergies at the time and decided to go a bit longer so I exclusively b/f ds until he was 4 1/2 months, and then did a bit of baby rice and so on. Looking back it was a bit pointless and I could have waited longer, but at the time, first time mother, what did I know? Anyway, dd got 5 1/2 months exclusive b/f and then she was really ready to eat and didn't bother much with baby rice and so on, just had loads of different veg and fruit. Also, being a lazy mummy at heart, I was more than happy to have a month's less pureeing. If I have another baby, I will go the full six months. My particular reasons for doing this are all to do with allergies and asthma, which we have severely on my side of the family. I admit to being slightly hysterical about the subject - if they said allergies were reduced by banging a tambourine over my children's beds every night, I would do it.

Bron · 11/03/2004 13:28

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Pidge · 11/03/2004 13:31

My dd had no solids just breastmilk for 6 months - slept throught the night for 12 hours from 5 months, is a champion eater (now 19 months), and still breastfeeding too!

Stick too your guns if you're happy continuing to just breastfeed.

hercules · 11/03/2004 13:38

DD is exclusive bf at 5 months and wont be starting solids until 6 months. WHO have recommended this for years and Dept of health do now also. The bounty weaning guide also says wait until 6 months, personally i think this is far easier than faffing around early than you have to.
My hv has never heard of this so i just ignore her.
Bounty guide is quite good btw for foods.

Spod · 11/03/2004 18:40

what gets me is that it seems far too early for my dd to start on solids and if the reccommendations are for 6 months WHY are SO MANY people telling me to wean and find it difficult to believe that I should leave it till 6 months. strange. Is it different if bottlefed? I will wait as long as possible!

OP posts:
Coddy · 11/03/2004 18:48

because lot of people give up bfeeding and go back to work?

bobsmum · 11/03/2004 19:14

I waited till 5 1/2 mths and even then only caved in cos everyone around me had started weaning at 4 months or earlier (9 weeks in my nephew's case!!!!!! ) Also had (and still have) a 91st-98th centile ds and he managed to wait with no grumpiness or hunger as far as I could tell so I'm positive we cold have stuck it out until 6 months with no problems. I will definitely leave it till 6 mths for baby number 2.

Clayhead · 11/03/2004 19:32

Me! Just ds though, weaned dd at 4 months like everyone else because I was lacking in experience/advice to know otherwise. Still got myself into trouble with my HV then for delaying meat/fish until 8 months.

Ds is now 27 weeks, been weaning for 10 days and I can't believe how much easier I've found weaning him than dd, because he's so much older he's able to 'get it' so much faster. He's has some banana as a finger food today, rice cakes as well as his pureed food.

I would definitely recomend waiting if you can. I don't know why other people seem to want to rush you, I was inundated with comments about weaning ds but ignored them, it also helps that I give the HV a wide berth now too, now I have more confidence.

Good luck.

Starsky · 11/03/2004 20:05

My dd was bf until 6 months and I echo what others have said here. She was fine on just milk and slept through from about 4 months on. Once she started on food she took to it right away and has always been a good eater. I was worried at the time about when to start her, but I am so glad I went with my instincts and waited. Do what you think is right

ks · 11/03/2004 20:28

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

Khara · 11/03/2004 22:04

I weaned my ds at 5 months but in hindsight wish I'd waited. My friend managed to go to 6 months with her dd, even though she was a big baby (91st centile.) It is realistic, but you have to be realistic about how often your baby will feed. (My friend co-slept and her dd breastfed often in the night.)

SofiaAmes · 11/03/2004 23:34

I bf both of mine until 6 months. It's supposed to be the healthiest thing for them. and it's also super convenient. There is no medical evidence that solids make a baby more likely to sleep through the night. Both my children are big healthy easy children who eat everything. I started solids with the normal mush. I did everything homemade and as soon as I had spent a few months testing foods for allergies (there are a lot in my family), I just started mushing up what we ate. B

SamN · 18/03/2004 23:12

I agree with most of you, and 'Wilbur' in particular. My son had an intolerance to cow's milk (he reacted to it through my breastmilk) and the stuff I had read implied it would be good to delay introducing solids. But I was so looking forward to giving him solid food!! and I asked a paediatrician (who I trusted) and he said it would be fine to start him off on baby rice, then pureed fruit and veg. So I did, at about 4.5 months - but I now wish I hadn't, and with the next one I shall delay weaning onto solids for as long as possible.

It's hard when everyone around you is starting on solids, partly because they're keen to move on to another 'stage' in their baby's development, partly because they think it will help with sleeping, growth or whatever. But I remember talking to my aunt about it, who has 5 kids, and she said her eldest only started on solids at about 8 months - and that you know when they really want to eat solids because they will try to grab your food when you're eating!

Good luck spod

Sam

p.s. the myth about solids helping them to sleep through is just that, a myth. Plus I agree with you that they may seem to be extra hungry at around 4 months, but I think it's just another growth spurt and people just want to interpret it as a desire for solid food.

SamN · 18/03/2004 23:14

also I sympathise with Cowhead's experience with health visitors. Some HVs are great, some aren't. Mine wasn't, but it took me at least 8 months before I stopped asking her for advice and taking notice of what she said!

Sam