Our school's dinners bear no relation to those featured in that blog, but cost the same amount. They are balanced and varied, cooked from scratch on the premises and full of veg.
However, my DC in year 2 does find the portion sizes small. It's a problem, because the activity levels of the children vary so much. I have a child who cycles to and from school and bombs around at every outdoor opportunity, as well as after school for an hour and participating in organised sports. Also fidgets all day and has the physique of an athletic stick. Lots of children are driven to school, sit around at playtimes chatting and then are driven home again where they sit in front of the TV. I expect the number of calories the two different lifestyles require is v different. Yet, schools must provide healthy food and follow average guidelines. I think they're between a rock and a hard place.
Nothing excuses the crap depicted in the blog
. I also agree with colditz.
Tbh though, I got free school meals in the 1980s, and the stuff on that blog looks more nutritious (though not more filling) than what we used to get
.