I've always tried to be relaxed about mealtimes and try not to create issues around food. I've always believed that everyone is born with self regulation in this area - we all know instinctively how much caloric intake we need over time. Sometimes we are hungrier than others, sometimes we are hungry a few times a day and other days we need to graze more often. When parents try to take control of this self regulatory feature the message you are giving them is that although your body knows this, you can't be trusted to make these most basic decisions about your own body so I need to do it for you. This message is then carried over into other areas and the child may not feel secure or confident to listen to what their instincts are telling them and may often be looking to you for help or cornfirmation of what they should do.
DS is actually a good eater in that there is not much he doesn't actually like apart from spicy food.
If there is a new food on his plate that he hasn't tried before I don't mind too much if he doesn't want to try it. I read somewhere that it can take up to 50 times of seeing a food item on their plate before they will feel comfortable enough to try it.
However there is often food he claims he doesn't like when put in front of him that I know he does like and he has often asked for it or put it on his plate himself.
Does anyone else have this problem and how do you deal with it? I know the golden rules of not begging, bribing, coaxing, shouting etc. I know that you should avoid turning mealtimes into a battle and avoid power struggles where no one wants to back down and give in first.
Do you encourage them to eat it, make it more fun by listening to music, singing songs and playing games, tell them they do like it, offer something different or do you just let them get on with it and go hungry?
Is saying "just eat 1 more pea, then you can get down and do X, Y, or Z" a bribe?
Is saying "'eat your dinner and if you are still hungry you can have dessert, but if you aren't hungry anymore you don't have to finish dinner. If you are hungry later you can have dessert then" any different to saying "eat your dinner and you can have dessert?"
I've never used dessert as a reward or witholding it as a punishment - he has always been allowed one if he wants one. We usually wait about 40 minutes before having a dessert, sometimes he is hungry again and wants one, other times he says he isn't hungry and doesn't have one. Desserts in our house are generally healthy anyway. Things like fruit salad, homemade jelly, homemade trifle, frozen yoghurt/fruit smoothie, homemade ice lollies, rice pudding etc. I read that waiting 40 minutes allows your body to absorb some of the protein, carbohydrates and healthy fats before the fat-storing sugar-rush of your dessert. The larger your meal, the less will be absorbed and the more will be stored as fat if you have a sweet immediately afterwards. I don't believe in a hierachy of food - all foods are equal and all foods contribute to a balanced diet including a small amount of dessert (healthy or not) every now and then.
I read that it is wrong to eat until you feel full, you should stop eating once you don't feel hungry anymore. Also a meal should last at least 20 minutes because it takes 20 minutes from the start of the meal for your brain to realise it is satisfied.