Hi all
I'm usually a lurker - not by choice! I'm just not very good at 1 handed typing and only get here when I'm feeding dd.
During my lurkings, I've noticed there're lots of people using food as treats or a bargaining tool, eg "eat your veg or you can't have pudding", alternatively "Do your homework and you can have chocolate buttons", "Since you've been good we'll all go to McDonalds"... that sort of thing. In other words, playing off "good" food vs "bad" food with the treat being the "bad" food.
This has made me think. Dp and I love our food (translation: we are greedy pigs) and we do more or less eat whatever we want to. This works for us because a) we exercise and b) the food we like is reasonably healthy.
We have a 13 month old dd who has so far been a dream to feed - eats when she's hungry, doesn't when she isn't, and likes a wide range of stuff. No doubt this is all going to change soon!
So (welliemum finally gets to the point) my question is: can you feed a toddler/small child without ever making food a behaviour issue? ie food is just food, minimal labelling of food as "good" and "bad", and no glamorising of "bad" food by using it as a bribe or reward.
eg, dp and I eat chocolate fairly often because we like it; we don't agonise about it and we know it's not a substitute for actual food. It's just not a big deal.
Can this be done with a toddler/small child? Will they always try to push the boundaries, ie are you inevitably forced to use bargaining and make food rules? We do want dd to grow up enjoying her food in a straightforward kind of way as we do.
(PS it hardly goes without saying that this isn't a criticism of anyone who does use bribery - partly because we haven't been there yet, partly because I genuinely don't give a monkey's about how other people choose to do things).