Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Films

So, actually about "The Brutalist"

21 replies

MsAmerica · 12/02/2025 01:36

I tend to dislike threads that are overlong and become top-heavy, and when I started to look through the one entitled, " Has anyone seen the Brutalist?" it was mostly people saying no.

So, having seen The Brutalist, I didn't want this to get lost amidst the 100+ people saying no.

I was really looking forward to seeing it, apart from the length. But I kept telling myself that I've seen some great movies that were very long - The Right Stuff, Schindler's List, Reds, Gone With the Wind, Lawrence of Arabia, Kurosawa's Ran, Barry Lyndon, JFK, Branagh's Hamlet. I took the precaution of bringing snacks.

I was so hoping I could whole-heartedly urge everyone to see it. Now, it does happen to be a very good movie. It's the story of a prominent architect (Adrien Brody) who after surviving a Nazi concentration camp, settles in America, hoping to re-start his life. After struggling to find his footing with his cousin's furniture store, a fluke hooks him up with a rich entrepreneur (Guy Pearce), and he launches into a huge project. And of course there are all kinds of conflicts that ensue.

It's brilliant in many ways. It's beautifully directed by Brady Corbet. The performances are excellent, especially Brody and Pearce. The production is gorgeous. The reviews are enthusiastic. My only problem - and a caveat for others - is that, for me, there was something that kept me from completely submerging in it. Maybe it was the sense that I wasn't sure what the main characters were really feeling. It somehow didn't sweep me away as some of the aforementioned movies of the past. That wouldn't matter - except that it's such a major commitment of time.

I guess in the final analysis, a real movie-lover should see it, but it's not for anyone who mostly prefers the escapist entertainment of quickie comedy or romance.

Here are some critics' comments from Rotten Tomatoes:

The Brutalist is a sweeping film that encompasses everything great about cinema, and it feels simultaneously classic and modern.

It is so specific, lived-in and vibrant that you want to spend more time in this world even when it's harrowing.

The details are so intensely well thought-out that you might mistakenly run to Wikipedia to look up László Tóth.

Through László Tóth, Brady Corbet and Mona Fastvold highlight the importance of fighting to keep art alive in the face of the corrosive nature of capitalism.

The Brutalist is more than a film, it´s a cinematographic experience with architectural forms that surround us and contain us in this story.

The story, and the characters in the movie seem very real, as if this is a historical drama. This is a testament not only to the actors, but to writer-director Brady Corbet and co-writer Mona Fastvold.

It’s a story about America itself, a harsh criticism of what the country has perhaps always been, a place where dreams have an equal chance of dying as they do coming true.

The Brutalist is a big and bold story of the immigrant experience and the postwar American dream. It’s confounding yet always interesting — a heartening thing in these cinematically tough times.

Corbet's film is strange inside and out, mysterious, unpredictable, and very attractive.

Overall, this piece of art, accompanied by Daniel Blumberg's incredible two-hour score, is a bold epic – one with the narrative depth and scale of a rich classic novel that will stay with you for days afterwards.

Brady Corbet’s seismic drama reaches for the sky as it surveys the soul of a man and a nation.

It is a movie of towering scale, gravity and technical accomplishment.

OP posts:
dorathexplorer · 12/02/2025 20:50

See the other thread about it .

burnoutbabe · 12/02/2025 20:59

Yes I also gave my opinion on the other thread on the topic.

Enterthewolves · 12/02/2025 21:11

I thought it was emotionally void

cramptramp · 12/02/2025 21:27

I don't know how anyone can be arsed to sit through a film that is 3.5 hours long.

DianaTavernerFirstDesk · 15/02/2025 22:53

It left me cold, I couldn’t connect with it.

MsAmerica · 28/02/2025 00:10

dorathexplorer · 12/02/2025 20:50

See the other thread about it .

Nope. When a thread starts asking beforehand, and the first batch of replies mostly say, no, haven't seen it, I'm not going to wade through 100+ replies to try to weed out the few who may have seen it.

OP posts:
MsAmerica · 28/02/2025 00:10

Enterthewolves · 12/02/2025 21:11

I thought it was emotionally void

That's a really apt phrase, better than anything I could come up with.

OP posts:
MsAmerica · 28/02/2025 00:12

cramptramp · 12/02/2025 21:27

I don't know how anyone can be arsed to sit through a film that is 3.5 hours long.

Haven't you ever seen a long movie that you loved? I mentioned a few that I thought were very worthwhile. The trick is that you have to plan your bathroom break.

OP posts:
SnowflakeSmasher86 · 28/02/2025 00:26

I was planning to see it at the cinema as I imagine the large scale would work better for the architecture and cinematography. But at 3.5 hours I might wait and watch at home where I can pause for a wee/nap if needed!

EdgarAllenRaven · 28/02/2025 00:49

For me, it was the reveal at the end that made it a Masterpiece.
That is when you finally understand why he was so obsessed with the building and went back to build it. And then you understand what pain he and his wife must have gone through.
The whole point is that you don’t fully understand them, until then suddenly you do.

pinkdelight · 28/02/2025 01:09

The whole point is that you don’t fully understand them, until then suddenly you do.

Glad it worked for you but I found that last act really crummy and distancing. And if you can't make the whole point in the vast time already, it's bizarre to me to tell us it so literally at the end instead of dramatising it throughout the film. Why spend so long on furniture stores and marble purchasing trips and then just add in the whole point as a clunky coda? It really didn't move me at all unfortunately.

cramptramp · 28/02/2025 08:25

@MsAmerica
Haven't you ever seen a long movie that you loved? I mentioned a few that I thought were very worthwhile. The trick is that you have to plan your bathroom break.

I watched Casino and Gangs of New York at home, but thought both could have been shorter with no detriment to the story. The thought of sitting that long in the cinema doesn't appeal to me

burnoutbabe · 28/02/2025 08:28

Yeah it didn't do that for me either.

I just figured he was building what he wanted to build. So it was no great reveal at the end as it was never any mystery why he was building in the first place. It was his vision /design etc.

I rated it 3.5/5 as it was well made but I can't say I enjoyed it much. Was great full for the built in break.

DapperDame · 28/02/2025 15:47

I loved it and want to see it again!

LollyWillow · 01/03/2025 07:44

I loved it. The reveal at the end did work for me. Although I was engrossed in the film all the way through I was aware that it was making me feel anxious, uncomfortable and a little claustrophobic.
It felt a relief to have an ending that explained the maze like buildings and the wierd proportions of all of the rooms - that told me why I was feeling claustrophobic - but that also made me question the relationships between the protagonists and think again about what I'd been watching.
That said, I did think the coda was a little clunky and rushed. Frankly, the film could have been longer.
I don't really understand the complaints about the length, but then, I go to the theatre almost weekly and so sitting down for three hours or more could be described as my main hobby!
I can't wait to watch it again now I know the whole story.
One last thing - I thought Felicity Jones' performance was fantastic. Scene stealing. She deserves the Oscar and it's a shame she won't get it.

category12 · 02/03/2025 12:53

MsAmerica · 28/02/2025 00:12

Haven't you ever seen a long movie that you loved? I mentioned a few that I thought were very worthwhile. The trick is that you have to plan your bathroom break.

You don't need to plan it, there's an interval in the Brutalist. 😄

I think "emotionally void" is about right. I was impressed by the look and atmosphere of it, though.

MsAmerica · 03/03/2025 01:02

category12 · 02/03/2025 12:53

You don't need to plan it, there's an interval in the Brutalist. 😄

I think "emotionally void" is about right. I was impressed by the look and atmosphere of it, though.

I was speaking of movies generally.

OP posts:
TwentyKittens · 03/03/2025 10:24

I loved that there was an intermission, and think longer films should go for this more often.

Emotionally void is an excellent way of describing it. Each character had that void in one way or another.

I think I need to watch the last bit again. At the time it felt like a clunky add on that didn't fit with the rest so I probably didn't engage with it properly.

MsAmerica · 04/03/2025 02:27

TwentyKittens · 03/03/2025 10:24

I loved that there was an intermission, and think longer films should go for this more often.

Emotionally void is an excellent way of describing it. Each character had that void in one way or another.

I think I need to watch the last bit again. At the time it felt like a clunky add on that didn't fit with the rest so I probably didn't engage with it properly.

I agree about the end. Especially if it's not fact-based.

OP posts:
Tinseltuttifruitti · 04/03/2025 07:10

Personally I think it's worth watching but misses the mark a little, it was trying to he too many things at once. I would have liked it to be more of a story about the rottenness of the American dream like the Godfather.

Enterthewolves · 04/03/2025 08:45

I thought the tacked on ending showed a fundamental lack of faith by the film maker, they had to explain the film to us in case we’d missed the meaning in the preceding 3 hours and 15 minutes. It felt lazy and lacked confidence.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page