Please bear with me....
Ok, I'll be the first to admit that I am a bit anal about what films my DS (just 8) watches. I don't go with the 'It depends on the child' philosophy - I am more of the 'I don't want violent images imprinted on his retinas' School.
So, as a result he hasn't seen any of the Spiderman movies and such like.
But I am aware that he probably could now that he is 8. (I can't stand hearing of 4 year olds who watch it - sorry ... just the way I am)
Anyhoo ... Harry Potter. I am a huge fan ... so we have watched the HP films slowly but surely. First one was when he was 6. At 7 we got to the Prisoner of Azk. All ok.
A couple of weeks ago I got out the Goblet of Fire ... we watched it together and we talked it all over as it went along. Bit nasty at the end but DS was fine ... all fine. To be honest, DS was more into the 'bonus disc' that showed all the special effects and the interviews with the cast - he loved the technical stuff (blue screen etc)
He has a friend down the road and they spend a lot of time together after school. They came running in the other day asking to see HP. So I phoned her dad to see if it was ok. He said, no it wasn't and he'd rather she didn't watch it just yet (she is nearly 9). Ok, I understood completely.
Then, yesterday ... DS came home from her house and told me he had watched the second Pirates of the Carribbean film.
I haven't seen it but I was under the impression it was pretty violent (yes fun and great and all that - but violent). I have to say I am a bit miffed they didn't ask me first like I asked them about HP ... but I won't make a thing of it ... I can live with it (DS is 8 after all)
But, which film is 'worse' in your opinion? Just so I know ...
Thanks for listening ...
Apologies for long post ...