Ok, but there WAS something suspicious here. It wasn't just a premature labour.
When this lady found out she was pregnant she is tried initially to get an abortion but was beyond 24, weeks.
So then she researched buying abortion pills.
Then at 28 weeks (so 0-4 weeks after being refused an abortion, less time then that since she'd rejected the idea of taking the pills illegally), her baby was born suddenly at home, with no medics in attendance at that stage.
Thankfully baby made it, but this really did have red flags.
However whether abortion was legal or not, they'd have likely been police involvement anyway in this case whilst they established whether they're had been any post birth attempts to harm the baby, given the recent history.
For those that think it should be perfectly legal for women to conduct later term abortions on themselves, what happens when the baby survives but suffers terrible injuries or lifelong disabilities?
Do we just shrug that off as the consequences of a legal choice?
What if the baby initially survives but subsequently dies? Perhaps after a long hospital battle? The abortion was induced in a fetus, but reef in the death of a baby?
Where a post 24 week pregnancy ends at home unattended (like if the baby in this case had not been born alive), police and the coroner would need to be involved to establish whether the baby had been born alive. That would happen irrespective of the abortion laws.
With the rise of at home abortions, pills in the post etc, it's never been so easy for a woman to obtain a late term/at term abortion. We aren't even talking about back street abortion here, but completely removing the ban on DIY abortions!
I don't want a woman taking abortion pills to abort a 30 week old fetus, that may suffocate at birth or (if mum changes her mind and calls an ambulance) may be disabled for life by this. I absolutely think this should be illegal.