I have been to at least one exhibition where they talked about how someone must have been trans, living as a man. It's possible she felt that way. But much more likely that it was the only way she could follow a career expressly forbidden to her as a woman, and ignoring all those barriers seemed disingenuous.
I'm more than happy for interpretations of art to be reviewed and reconsidered. But it cannot be done without question, nor with ignoring the mores of the time of the work's creation.
It's the idea you can't question anything, nor say anything that doesn't follow the acceptedline that is so depressing. What happened to critical thinking and disagreement? I might well be wrong about some of the things I think, especially those I know little about - but I should be able to express and debate thst, and acknowledge there might be other valid points of view.
Curations that don't acknowledge there's more than one way of lookat something are failing us.