What really annoys me about the question about "traditional" roles, is why it's always about whether the cooking/cleaning/childcare is split so that women do it all when actually, while this might not be true across the board, it seems to me that 50 years ago, in more or less middle class families, "traditional" roles may well have seen women doing the vast bulk of the domestic load - cooking, cleaning, shopping etc, sure. but there were a bunch of things that were traditionally "men's jobs that somehow, now seem to be done by women.
eg working. For a start. Lots of those "traditional" families had a man working and mum at home, which immediately made the "traditional" split less hard for the woman.
Also, there are a lot of things that growing up my dad and most of my friend's dads did that we saw as "men" jobs that somehow today have been dumped back on the women. eg, anything that was a bit more onerous - so even where the mum was in charge of the garden overall, it was the men (and our brothers) who were mowing the lawn, doing the heavy pruning, doing the skip runs etc. Bins and DIY - absolutely the men. In terms of children/childcare - I'd say overall, the dads were the ones who did the weekend sports runs/sports activities/match watching. They DEFINITELY did the majority of late night lifting and carrying for teenagers. It was Dads who did the "outdoorsy" stuff - we went for walks, to the park, camping, taught us to ride our bikes (and in time, drive our cars) etc.
Even just things like shopping - my dad actually did a lot of the shopping and I feel like that might have been true for my friends too. But was DEFINITELy true was, for example, if Mum and I did the shopping, Dad would be there unloading the car, helping to unpack the shopping etc. And I think that was pretty routine.
School runs - in most cases, the dads did the school run on their way to work. Admittedly, I grew up in another country where school started much earlier so that was a more practical option than it might be here where schools tend to start later.
Also re finances, I remember my great aunt telling me that after her DH died, she'd been a bit surprised to discover how little money he had. She had actually worked a lot of the time, but he had always had the "main job" and had paid all the bills etc. She said that he never once let slip that actually, his disposable income was very little. She was embarrassed that she'd never realised that he didn't buy things for himself because he just didn't have the money. I think that was true for a lot of men of this sort of generation - they worked and perhaps they had their sports or golfing activity or whatever, but they prioritised their wife and children over themselves in terms of spending. A friend told me a few years ago that while her DH paid for everything as she was a SAHM, she needed a little part time job on the side to pay for things like getting her hair done or whatever. I couldn't get my head around it. If anything, I feel like when I was growing up there was a slightly paternalistic attitude of, "ooh, must give wifey the cash so she can look nice etc" which obviously wasn't great, but my point is that I'm so tired of "traditional" roles only being looked at from a cooking/cleaning/childcare perspective.
Sorry, very long. Bit of a rant.
EDIT: the reason this annoys me SOOO much is that MIL was annoyed that SIL wasn't cooking every night for exBIL.... even though, exBIL didn't earn any money, do any chores etc etc etc. She didn't seem to think THAT was a problem, only that SIL wasn't doing her traditional role. sigh.