Why trans are encouraged to leave families in a nutshell!

29 replies

Moomoola · 10/06/2023 12:10

like many people our trans daughter (girl) has been encouraged to just leave home, live with medicalised ftom partner and glitter mum and go no contact.

I’m finding it difficult to explain how nasty the trans ideology can be, without sounding nuts.

Friends ( especially teacher friends) ask me incredulously, well why would the trans community want people to leave their families? They just want to live their lives without being attacked’
The implication being I can’t have used the correct pronouns, I’m old fashioned , I’m over reacting, she’s nearly 18..oh she is now 18.

I know there’s a lot of come and join our gang, and you’ll be accepted..but why?

i have a vague idea - I know commercialism is part of it (primark, etc), I know they ( certainly the partner)likes to think everyone hates them because they are trans - I’m guessing that makes you feel important and if young trans teens are being angry, they are not questioning.

as you can see from this post, I’m not overly coherent!
can any wise mumsnetters sum it up for me, so I don’t get tongue tied?

many many thanks.

OP posts:

Chickaboop · 28/06/2023 14:11

Moomoola · 28/06/2023 08:16

Thanks. But why? Why do they do this? I believe there is some incredibly rich, powerful people behind this - big pharma for a start. I think I read that every medicalised trans person creates $1.3 million profit.
and of course, Stonewall seems to have created trained people who are now working at other places and spreading the word.
But why? And why are we all falling for it?
Especially when we are told to ‘be kind’ but obviously we are not being kind enough.
Who thinks this is ok? Ffs.
I am very confused. And quite emotional. And, yesgrapehyacinth we thought we were being supportive. But obviously not supportive enough - though it’s not deemed a requirement to let us know how and why.

I thought this looked quite interesting as one example:

https://www.frc.org/blog/2021/04/staggering-reach-billionaire-transgender-activists

The Staggering Reach of Billionaire Transgender Activists

This is part 2 of a 3-part series. Read part 1. The first billionaire we have to thank for pushing incessant trans

https://www.frc.org/blog/2021/04/staggering-reach-billionaire-transgender-activists

Original poster

Moomoola · 28/06/2023 23:08

Blooming heck, I’m speechless. Thank you chickaboop.

OP posts:

Chickaboop · 29/06/2023 20:51

It’s bonkers isn’t it! Someone mentioned it on Ovarit offhand a bit ago and I was properly stunned.

Shame that site is so sketchy but it does have interesting info on them! There’s 2 others in the series too.

Original poster

Moomoola · 30/06/2023 07:44

Thanks - I hadn’t heard of ovarit either.
the reassignment if language is really interesting- trans sexual is now the far less threatening transgender, top surgery, etc.
also
‘Altering language this way is a classic John Money tactic. Money was the person responsible for shifting everyone away from using the term “sexual preference” to the term “sexual orientation.” To have a sexual preference implies a person has a say in who they desire to have sex with. A sexual orientation, on the other hand, implies the person was born with those desires and they, therefore, remain totally out of their control. (Can you see why a pedophile might prefer option B?) ‘

we’re screwed.
the rest of the article suggests why we are now getting furries and reconstructed sex bits normalized - or is that too mad?

OP posts:

Flip

1 2