Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: chat

Women endangered by police for coronation

97 replies

bd67thSaysReinstateLangCleg · 07/05/2023 15:27

Buried in the middle of Grauniad article about the Republic arrests, the police arrested workers issuing rape alarms as part of a project called "Night Stars". Night Stars is run by Westminster Council with Home Office funding to help keep safe the women who work at night in places like Soho.

Adam Hug, the Labour leader of Westminster city council, said he was “urgently pushing the police for proper answers” after three council volunteers were arrested at about 2am on Saturday in Soho and later released on bail after they were found in possession of rape alarms. Police said “military colleagues” had believed such devices could be used to disrupt parading horses, posing “significant risk to the safety of the public and the riders”.

The council, however, said the devices were for the Night Stars volunteers to give out to vulnerable women and they were funded by a Home Office grant.

Can we talk about how women's safety has been undermined by the same Metropolitan Police force that employed the rapist-murderer of Sarah Everard (no, I will not write his name) so that a rich powerful man can have a crown put on his head?

OP posts:
MrsTerryPratchett · 07/05/2023 18:49

It's a problem when women's issues are treated as the property of resentful, petty-minded and envious leftists. Opposing violence against women and girls doesn't go hand-in-hand with opposing the monarchy you know!

'Envious' is interesting.

You can have your own Venn diagram as well, where your work on women's issues correlates with other things.

And frankly, after years when i would have seen myself as a leftie, I no longer do. Still anti-monarchy and anti-police overreach. Since the Criminal Justice Bill marches. Lots of police overreach then too.

bd67thSaysReinstateLangCleg · 07/05/2023 18:53

Opposing violence against women and girls doesn't go hand-in-hand with opposing the monarchy you know!

What stops someone pro-monarchy from objecting to the unlawful arrests of people who are doing lawful work that the police are partners to, pray?

This insinuation that someone who supports the monarchy must be willing to go along with the police abusing their powers isn't a good look for monarchists.

OP posts:
AbsolutePixels · 07/05/2023 18:56

You keep asserting that the police were abusing their powers in this incidence, but you have no evidence to support that claim!

bd67thSaysReinstateLangCleg · 07/05/2023 18:58

It wouldn't matter if the parade was Pride or the investiture of an elected mayor or even the inauguration of the first president of the People's Communist Republic of Great Britain. I would still object to night safety workers being arrested for handing out rape alarms.

This is not about the monarchy.

OP posts:
AbsolutePixels · 07/05/2023 19:00

If it was Pride, I'd be handing out the alarms myself. 😂

bd67thSaysReinstateLangCleg · 07/05/2023 19:00

AbsolutePixels · 07/05/2023 18:56

You keep asserting that the police were abusing their powers in this incidence, but you have no evidence to support that claim!

What else do you call arresting someone who really should not have been arrested?

OP posts:
bd67thSaysReinstateLangCleg · 07/05/2023 19:04

AbsolutePixels · 07/05/2023 19:00

If it was Pride, I'd be handing out the alarms myself. 😂

One rule for the people you agree with and another for those you don't agreed with. It certainly explains all your contributions to this thread.

OP posts:
SerendipityJane · 07/05/2023 19:04

AbsolutePixels · 07/05/2023 18:56

You keep asserting that the police were abusing their powers in this incidence, but you have no evidence to support that claim!

It's entirely possible the police weren't abusing their powers.

In which case a much wider debate is needed about those powers and their extent.

And for all the wokey-frippery bollocks about pronouns and "da feelzs" it's only original stylee natural born women that can be raped. For the agency that laughingly is tasked with protecting us to disarm us is beyond chilling.

AbsolutePixels · 07/05/2023 19:06

One rule for the people you agree with and another for those you don't agreed with.

Yes.

bd67thSaysReinstateLangCleg · 07/05/2023 19:10

it's only original stylee natural born women that can be raped

No, but..

  • we make up six in seven victims
  • we are the rape victims who can be made pregnant
  • we cannot rape
OP posts:
AbsolutePixels · 07/05/2023 19:12

I do agree, the police are a big problem.

bd67thSaysReinstateLangCleg · 07/05/2023 19:14

AbsolutePixels · 07/05/2023 19:06

One rule for the people you agree with and another for those you don't agreed with.

Yes.

And here I was thinking that you were here to debate in good faith, with some shared values about the rule of law applying to everyone equally.

OP posts:
RafaistheKingofClay · 07/05/2023 19:15

AbsolutePixels · 07/05/2023 18:36

It's a problem when women's issues are treated as the property of resentful, petty-minded and envious leftists. Opposing violence against women and girls doesn't go hand-in-hand with opposing the monarchy you know!

This whole thread is so disingenuous. The rape-alarm threat has been in the papers for a few weeks now. If these activists were legit, why couldn't they have delayed handing the alarms out until last night?

Delay it? They hand them out every Friday and Saturday night and the police know it because they are involved with Westminster’s night safety scheme. They train the volunteers.

If the police are absolutely right, why on the receipt of credible info did they not contact Westminster and ask the volunteers not to hand them out that night? It would have been easy enough to do.

And why did they delete their initial tweet that referred to throwing rape alarms not using them? If having something in your possession that could be thrown at a horse anywhere in central London not just the parade route is an offence we are all in trouble.

bd67thSaysReinstateLangCleg · 07/05/2023 19:21

If having something in your possession that could be thrown at a horse anywhere in central London not just the parade route is an offence we are all in trouble.

Keys, wallet, water bottle, phone...

It's because they don't want to admit that the real reason was to stop the alarms being used to make noise as part of a protest. They don't want to admit that they are cracking down on protest because they know how bad the optics of that are.

OP posts:
AbsolutePixels · 07/05/2023 19:25

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

bd67thSaysReinstateLangCleg · 07/05/2023 19:50

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Pride started as a protest against the criminalisation of homosexuality. While I agree that it has degenerated into a capitalist wokefest since then, its roots are more noble than any coronation as they are the start of the fight for gay people's civil rights.

"We've done it this way for ages" doesn't mean it's still a good idea.

As for "freak show", I'd say that having a huge parade and ceremony to make someone the head of the English branch of the imaginary sky fairy's fan club is pretty weird behaviour too. And those robes, they look like something a live action role player would wear to play a wizard.

My point being that you aren't the sole arbiter of which parades are and aren't worth having.

OP posts:
SerendipityJane · 07/05/2023 19:55

bd67thSaysReinstateLangCleg · 07/05/2023 19:21

If having something in your possession that could be thrown at a horse anywhere in central London not just the parade route is an offence we are all in trouble.

Keys, wallet, water bottle, phone...

It's because they don't want to admit that the real reason was to stop the alarms being used to make noise as part of a protest. They don't want to admit that they are cracking down on protest because they know how bad the optics of that are.

We are back to laws that only need to be applied against "the wrong type".

Much like the sus laws mysteriously only ever applied to young black men.

One of the markers of tyranny is laws that are applied arbitrarily. Something which the UK has always had, by the way - it never went away.

FurAndFeathers · 07/05/2023 19:56

AP5Diva · 07/05/2023 16:38

Hmm. The issue with the rape alarms is that they would be used to make horses bolt into the crowds. Have you seen the carnage a bolting horse can cause ploughing into a crowd of likely children in the front and adults behind? The police weren’t acting in this case to protect the RF, but regular spectators, otherwise known as innocent bystanders.

Horses trained to deal with fireworks, gunfire and brass bands might bolt into the crowd at the sound of a rape alarm?

gosh that’s very specific!

what about car and burglar alarms? Did the police deactivate all if those within earshot too?

medianewbie · 07/05/2023 19:58

FictionalCharacter · 07/05/2023 16:14

I don’t believe them because it just isn’t plausible. This is a night safety team handing out rape alarms to women at 2AM. If “activists” were planning to set off rape alarms the next day, they would just buy a load of them and go into London on the day. They wouldn’t hang around London in the middle of the night waiting for a team of night safety workers to hand an few out.

Setting off a rape alarm isn’t likely to faze an Army or police horse so badly that the rider or public are endangered. They are trained to endure all kinds of loud noise including gunfire, cannons, fireworks, explosions, noisy riots, car horns, and sirens. They sometimes spook at random things as horses do, but the riders get them under control quickly.

It’s another example of overzealous policing imo. They didn’t need to arrest anyone. If they were genuinely concerned that the alarms could have been misused, they could have told the volunteers to suspend their work until the next night. They’re getting more and more enthusiastic about arresting people if they can vaguely connect them to some imagined “activism” or “protest”. Meanwhile MNers frequently report calling the police for very serious reasons and not being taken seriously. The police are increasingly looking not at all like public servants, and more like the Government’s private army.

@FictionalCharacter hear! hear!

SerendipityJane · 07/05/2023 20:02

what about car and burglar alarms? Did the police deactivate all if those within earshot too?

I can see the next protest being people using their car horns in concert at "divers places in the Kings peace" (I think we need to get used to old spelling as we go back in time). Which some people might be grateful isn't a tactic Just Stop Oil can use.

Show throwing has a long and proud tradition in the history of protest.

And of course a well timed fart. Especially if you can ignite it.

I can see the police confiscating prunes, artichokes and beanz soon.

bd67thSaysReinstateLangCleg · 07/05/2023 20:06

One of the markers of tyranny is laws that are applied arbitrarily.

Another marker is the state and its various organs then lying about doing so.

OP posts:
bd67thSaysReinstateLangCleg · 07/05/2023 20:15

the head of the English branch of the imaginary sky fairy's fan club

A church that only exists because a man who went on to become a serial wife killer wanted a divorce. But yeah, really valuable ceremony, that.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread