I totally agree. Exposing your genitals to someone is a sex crime. You are forcing them to look at your genitals without their consent, for your gratification. It should be taken more seriously and it needs a new description 'flashing' sounds almost funny. Sexual exposure or something more serious would give it a more appropriate description. I actually think there should also be consequences for sending dick pics. It's exactly the same thing but just done digitally. If men thought they were going to get fined or put on a sex offenders register if they did it, they might think twice. As it is, women are subjected, again, to being forced to look at a man's penis without wanting to or asking to.
Not that anyone has asked but for various reasons this has been a topic on my mind recently, to make rape convictions more successful they need to BAN any investigation into the victim's previous sexual history. This is one moment, one action, one rape (or multiple in some cases) and that is what needs to be on trial, not the victims. They can be a sex workers, extremely promiscuous, cheating on their partner with multiple people, it is irrelevant, rape is rape.
No-one puts mugging victims under the spotlight - should you have been walking home alone that night, have you walked home alone many nights before? It would be ludicrous.
But, of course, these things are crimes against women and therefore will never be taken seriously because as we all know, women have a huge, well documented history of violence against men and being devious liars who like nothing more than having intrusive medical examinations followed by their personal lives torn apart on a witness stand when they falsely accuse poor men of raping them 
