I had a fairly sizeable row with two good friends yesterday (one male, one female) who both adore Virginie Despentes which finished with them telling me I'm narrow minded, inflexible of thinking, lacking compassion, generally a wrong 'un because I wouldn't agree that men who use prostitutes are suffering just as much as the women are and we shouldn't say negative things about them. They refuse to acknowledge it's anything other than a choice for women, and have totally bought into Despentes' argument about "the men behind the clients". The man told me I understood nothing about male desire, that no man actually wants to visit a prostitute, it's because they have no other choice
. Oh and also said it's not like rich men are going to prostitutes, they don't need to, girls with no self-respect throw themselves at them.
I was totally gobsmacked. And thought it was pretty bloody outrageous they were suggesting I was the one who hadn't properly thought about the topic. And was scolded for not approaching it with understanding.
Female friend said that if she was a widow and a hot young man offered her sex and then said she had to pay for it she probably would, and seemed to think that won the argument.
My feminist reading has been in the U.K. Do you have any ideas where I can find voices that contradict Despentes please? (Although I doubt they'll listen, they talk about her like she's an Oracle). Thanks!