I mentioned lack of sex-based data collection as being a specifically misogynistic but in general sexist failure of many public sector datasets within the NHS and other health related areas, in my response.
It contributes to lack of research data and therefore stops developments of new treatments if you have skewed research data because you fudged asking about sex by only asking about ‘gender’.
Understandably some people will give a ‘gender’ question a gender identity response. Surveys should ask for biological sex, then ask about ‘gender identity’ separately, if relevant to what they need to know. You can’t change sex and it’s often going to be medically relevant for organisations like the NHS to know it. I think it’s a total failure of duty that they (and many others) often don’t seem to grasp this.
We should all be totally free to express our gender views (if we have them) however we wish.. but also we have a collective interest (and I would say then a responsibility) in ensuring we have sex-based datasets available for the good of ourselves and each other.
Emotional validation-based datasets are useless for analysing for biological answers, because medical reality affects us all regardless of our views when it comes to sex-based distribution of disease or health needs.