DD is an extra curricular type of child - very good at sport & music. We applied for 11+ scholarships in both to our preferred school, thinking mainly about the financial incentives and confidence boost for DD if she was awarded them.
She has always been the sports star at her prep school, so everyone was expecting the sports scholarship would be a walk in the park. Her musical talents are more hidden as she has her lessons outside of school and hasn’t performed in school for a few years.
Today we got the news that she has been awarded a music scholarship but not sports. They’ve given the reason for not getting the sports as that “nerves got the better of her” on the assessment day. From the way she described it I don’t think she pushed herself to stand out at all - it’s not her style. I’m starting to realise that although she is really well co-ordinated etc. she hasn’t got the “killer instinct”/competitive edge for sport at the moment. This confidence might grow in the next few years though.
I’m obviously really proud about the music scholarship, but it’s starting to bother me that if we accept it she will be tied to the music department and won’t have spare time/opportunities to still do her sport. I’m worried that effectively we are cutting off her sporting potential, which might come out with improved confidence and maturity over the next few years.
DH is particularly upset about this...And as the music is my thing and sport is his it feels as if I’ve won, which I don’t feel comfortable with!
DD is really happy about music and a bit disappointed about sport, but not particularly upset. She tells me she prefers to do lots of music than sports, but I’m not sure if she’s just saying that to please me. Part of me thinks that her lack of enthusiasm for sport says it all - just because you’ve got a natural talent doesn’t mean you’ve got to do it?!
Any comments or advice much appreciated. We are intending to go into speak to the Head in the New Year.