Sigh.
These stories are not true. But they are good stories: gripping, frightening, a bit sexy. Definitely something you want to read, since after all it possibly concerns your future, right?
Newspapers want to sell papers, to make money. To sell papers they need good stories like these.
So they take a kernel of true fact. And then they make it sellable by imagining how this kernel of truth can be twisted into a Frankenstein.
Now, anyone wanting to rebutt these outrageous exaggerations will tend to do that with a reasonable appeal to facts. Here, I'll demonstrate:
- EU army: there has been a Common Foreign and Security Policy between some (not all) member states of the EU for a couple decades now. It's aim is to have cooperation on some military matters where these member states would want joint action. It could perhaps save money, given that not all countries would need to send their own contingents when a single one would do.
- EU Tax: since the end of 2015, a new EU rule has come into force, whereby a "tax number" (for UK citizens, the NI number will do) is used to identify individuals who bank abroad. This is to prevent tax evasion across borders, by helping national authorities understand who is paying tax where, as they should be.
- EU Central Bank: The European Central Bank is one of the institutions of the EU, and has been for 70 years. Its role has increased to supervision of the euro since the creation of that currency, which some, but not all, EU members use. Its role could continue to increase for euro-zone members, as and when they choose to deepen their cooperation in the euro-zone.
Problem is, anyone who's already been gripped by the sexy Frankenstein version of this first has confirmation bias: Aha! So there is some truth in this! So it could become as bad as that article said!
Isn't that how you felt reading my boring factual presentation?
That is how populist arguments are made, and fear whipped up. And then that fear is used by people who would like to use them to, let's say, consolidate their standing as the next Prime Minister?