Love and sympathy to all. It's so good to talk like this and that article was great. There's a David Sedaris quote about how old people used to die cleanly of heart attacks and cancer but now live on and on. He mentions a neighbour who was 80 with a parent alive. He says something about how you become too old to be someone's child - I know exactly how that feels, sort of stymied.
My Parkinson's paralysed, weekly pneumonia-infected father was admitted to hospital against his wishes, despite us having written firm instructions together. He had live-in carers but the agency told the carers 'he can't die on our watch'. He was nearly 90 with two live-in carers - who else's watch would he die on? I had to stop the doctors putting in a nasogastric tube, was too late for the intravenous antibiotics (he wanted only oral at home) but was able to stop them doing an x ray during which they thought they'd have to break some bones to get him straight enough. That phrase again, to what end? To find out where the aspiration was located. Again to what end?
When I asked the GP why they prescribing weekly antibiotics they snapped at me 'well do you want him to die?' which made me feel crap.
I think that the whole conversation around assisted dying is a distraction. It's aggressively assisted living that is the issue. DNACPRs need to be opt out after 75, for example. There should be an accepted protocol at, say, 65 or 70 where people do POAs and living wills, where what makes their life worth living is recorded.
Language around death needs to change. Why on earth did people talk about the Queen's death as a 'tragedy'? She was 96, ffs.