Looking for some hypothetical advice. I understand the cost of care and am not looking to dodge this but want to know what may happen in this scenario.
My parents are both 70, dad is pretty well and is mum’s carer. Mum has significant mobility and other complex medical issues and requires round the clock care. She is cognitively capable but the amount of opioids she takes for pain means that sometimes she is ‘out of it’. Dad is amazing and provides this care.
Due to a recent health scare of dad’s we have started to talk about the future. While it always seems more likely that mum would go first, if dad did go first mum would need us to move in with carers during the day. The alternative would be a home which will not happen if she remains as she is now. Their current house is my family home, it has 4 bedrooms, one of which is adapted for mum on the ground floor. She spends a lot of her time here. The rest of the house is big enough for our family of 4.
I love our home but it is Victorian and not suitable for mum’s needs so her moving to us would not be an option.
If we sold our house and mum’s house was transferred to us would the house be taken into account if she ran out of capital if we eventually had no alternative but to put her in a home? Mum’s house is worth more than ours so funds raised from ours would be around a third less than what hers would be worth as an asset.
In this scenario my ideal would be to ultimately pool resources and opt for somewhere with a connected annexe for mum but I’m not sure what the implications of this are.
Sorry for the long post!