Currently in process of doing POA for my grandparents, health already done.
Finance has been delayed due to them thinking they already had one registered, so it has taken a while to establish they haven’t!
Grandfather early stages of dementia (although not diagnosed & he refuses to engage with anything to do with this, refused memory clinic referral, he very much has head in sand so diagnosis not likely anytime soon) he does have capacity for POA though.
My question is whether its worth adding him as an attorney to my Nans financial POA.
They have a joint account but realistically she deals with everything & if she was incapacitated in reality it wouldn’t be him dealing with anything & he is happy for us to do so ….
But would it be best to have him named on it anyway?
It would be jointly & severally so not an issue with validity if he did become incapacitated also. Or is it best to just leave him off?
I just don’t want to be missing an obvious reason to name/not name him that will make life more difficult with a lot of stuff being in joint names.
He is not named on my Nans health POA but wondering if finance is different.
They are happy to ‘do what you think is best!’