I keep reading on here that people need to be prepared to save up / conserve assets / sell their homes etc to avoid going into local authority care homes, so that they have the option of going into a private home and that if they don’t have any savings etc, then they’ll end up in grotty LA owned home.
this wasn’t our experience at all. MIL has no assets to speak of, save her half of the property she owns with FIL. She has a tiny pension, and that’s about it. When she went from hospital into a nursing home, there was zero discussion of local authority vs private. She’s in a private care home (it’s certainly not LA owned) and gets exactly the same care as all the other guests in there. There’s no difference between what she gets and what her self-funded neighbours receive. She pays maybe £400 a month, which is basically her pension minus the pocket money allowance. There is no charge on the house AFAIK - it was entirely disregarded as Fil still lives there.
we are in Scotland - not sure of that makes a difference? And it’s a nursing home rather than a care home. I’m not disputing others experience, just wondering why it didn’t happen this way for us. I kept expecting the social worker to tell us some care homes weren’t available because she wasn’t self funding, but that didn’t happen. It seemed like they were all an option.