I am struck by how many seem to think we can't do much about our ability, it's a pretty static thing. IQ can't be grown so why try? You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.
Some think that innate talent is nothing and 99% is hard work (not on MN I would argue) .
The champion chess playing Polgar family believe this. They have produced 3 of the most successful female chess players ever. The youngest, Judit, is considered the best player of all time. She wasn't the talented one, her sister said 'Judit was a slow starter, but very hard working'.
Was this ability solely passed down through the genes?
Say a child passes into grammar school and yours doesn't. Someone gets the job and you don't. One child gets an A and the other a D in GCSE, one is cleverer, surely? They've both had the same opportunities and they're not lazy.
Were these people smarter and more talented/gifted?
Could it not be that they used better strategies, taught themselves more, practiced harder and worked through any obstacles? Did they have a goal and take real steps to make it happen and not leave it up to 'innate' ability?
It's possible for someone with an average IQ to get a first at university.
Is Malcolm Gladwell right?:
Apparently, in the sports world for example, we refuse to recognise the relationship between practise and improvement. We just talk about innate physical talent.
'People prize natural endowment over earned ability'
Can anyone really do anything? I think we can do a lot more than we might think, our 'ability' can improve immeasurably. We can grow and develop and we learn all the time.