OK, so ds started school in Switzerland aged 7.
When we moved to Germany, we decided to put him in 1 year below as he has had 3 years less primary education than his British peers. Due to the late Swiss start, there is so much he's not learnt. Plus his birthday is end August. Oh, and up till recently he had never been educated in English, so age 9 is only just learning to write in English etc.
Both his class teacher, head teacher and dh and I are happy he is in the right place. He's also physically quite small, so is one of the smallest in the class, although the eldest.
We are now looking at moving back to UK next year (Spring 2010). If he stays as he is, he would go into Year 6 in September 2010.
If, however he is forced to go into his official cohort, he will have to start secondary school in September 2010. So he will only have had 3 years education, be the very youngest in the year, still learning to write etc in ENglish.
I phoned some grammar schools in Sutton & they all said absolutely not a problem for him to stay as he is, and start secondary school in 2011. So I was feeling heartened.
But just got snooty email from Kent CC saying he would have to rejoin cohort & start secondary school in 2010.
And obviously, if this is the case, we would miss the application deadline for the secondary school, as this is in October 2009, and we don't move till 2010, maybe even just weeks before the school start.
Can I challenge this. Educationally for many reasons, it just seems to be a ridiculous and totally unfair rule which doesn't take into account the different educational experience, circumstances or needs of my ds.The fact is he has missed 3 years of school, is already out of year, and all his school beleieve he is suited to where is is now.
Does anyone know these 3 LEAs? (maybe Sutton or Surrey are more flexbile?) or if I can challenge this or stand a chance of fighting a 'no' or else any other way around this situation?
Phew. long and waffly. sorry. thanks