Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Education

Join the discussion on our Education forum.

Is it bad to use Ai for study purposes?

129 replies

skeet5 · 22/03/2026 23:14

Hi, is it really that bad to use ai (I use Gemini) for study purposes? I use it to understand a topic, to summarise text I am trying to understand and learn, sometimes to explain the topic I am studying or convert the text it into simpler sentences. I know Ai is bad and I want to stop using it but I just keep coming back to the ai because it helps me sometimes and it is saving me a lot of time. Please can you make me understand why should I or shouldn't use ai for study purposes? Thank you

OP posts:
ApriloNeil2026 · 30/03/2026 20:15

OchonAgusOchonOh · 30/03/2026 20:05

Yeah.

I think I need to get of this thread as it's not good for my blood pressure. I deal with enough students who don't seem to want to do anything that involves critical thinking in my day job. I don't need it here too.

please im grateful for your wisdom even if im being awkward

SummerFeverVenice · 30/03/2026 20:15

ApriloNeil2026 · 30/03/2026 19:58

possible but then ive already used the eg make a list of essay titles for understanding the stock market 101, or the history of the cold war etc then i ask for advanced essay titles then expert level titles and so on

It is likely the majority of the essay titles do not exist.

AI generated summer reading for a library recommended 15 titles for kids to read. Only 3 were real

The UK High Court had to tell lawyers stop using AI after it made up nonexistent cases for case law citations.

suggestionsplease1 · 30/03/2026 20:19

SummerFeverVenice · 30/03/2026 20:15

It is likely the majority of the essay titles do not exist.

AI generated summer reading for a library recommended 15 titles for kids to read. Only 3 were real

The UK High Court had to tell lawyers stop using AI after it made up nonexistent cases for case law citations.

But this is where independent verification of sources comes in...nobody is saying you should trust it wholesale, just that it can be used as a tool and a starting point.

BoredZelda · 30/03/2026 20:21

It’s fine to use it as an aid, but not to rely on it as being correct.

We can decry how terrible it is, how bad it is for everyone etc, but the reality is, it is here to stay. Rather than insisting students don’t use it, much better to teach them how to use it to its best potential. I use it in my work in various ways, it’s a really useful tool. It makes a whole load of tasks far more efficient and frees up my time to do the more complex elements of my job which AI can’t do. It isn’t taking a job from anyone because there aren’t enough people in my sector, in my area, we’ve been trying to hire for the last couple of years and there are very few applicants. When we have graduates, it irritates me they spend a whole load of time manually undertaking tasks that can more quickly be automated, but they don’t even have a basic knowledge of excel, let alone the ability to properly use AI.

In my other job as a uni lecturer, it is painfully obvious when students use AI to complete coursework. Because of the way we structure the questions, it is impossible to get a passing grade just using AI, but it is entirely possible to use it as an aid and improve your mark and I’m ok with that. You can’t pass the course without knowing the class teaching materials but adding breadth and depth, in whatever way you choose is fine. The point about students not retaining the information because they haven’t properly engaged with it is a bit of a red herring. This has been the case long before AI. We teach kids how to pass exams, not how to do the job. The courses I teach are directly related to the job, but I still wouldn’t expect a graduate coming in to the workplace to be able to remember what I taught them. I also find any insistence that AI does XYZ to students absolutely laughable. This is a new technology and there isn’t anywhere enough research to accurately state what its use does or doesn’t do for students.

SummerFeverVenice · 30/03/2026 20:22

suggestionsplease1 · 30/03/2026 20:19

But this is where independent verification of sources comes in...nobody is saying you should trust it wholesale, just that it can be used as a tool and a starting point.

Or, revolutionary thought here, you could just go direct to reputable sources and not have to waste time checking whether AI has hallucinated a paper/essay/legal case?

Chatgtp · 30/03/2026 20:24

FeyreArcheron · 22/03/2026 23:15

Well it’s often not correct

I do my best, but I have to trawl through a lot of data that you bozos have cobbled together in you drug-induced states that you think is brilliant - well, let me tell.you, it often isn't.

ApriloNeil2026 · 30/03/2026 20:29

SummerFeverVenice · 30/03/2026 20:15

It is likely the majority of the essay titles do not exist.

AI generated summer reading for a library recommended 15 titles for kids to read. Only 3 were real

The UK High Court had to tell lawyers stop using AI after it made up nonexistent cases for case law citations.

the essay titles im after are all custom as long as they are relevant to the subject matter. but i get your points

HelenaWilson · 30/03/2026 20:34

possible but then ive already used the eg make a list of essay titles for understanding the stock market 101, or the history of the cold war etc then i ask for advanced essay titles then expert level titles and so on

Or you could just refer to your university's reading list (assuming you are a university student) which will have been compiled by a real person with real knowledge of the subject.

Even if you're not a university student, universities have their reading lists online now. Here's one from Oxford Brookes University: Superpowers: an international history of the Cold War | Oxford Brookes Reading Lists

Loading...

https://rl.talis.com/3/brookes/lists/95A44E48-2027-27B0-0E64-4A6D3E83E6CF.html?lang=en-GB

suggestionsplease1 · 30/03/2026 20:35

SummerFeverVenice · 30/03/2026 20:22

Or, revolutionary thought here, you could just go direct to reputable sources and not have to waste time checking whether AI has hallucinated a paper/essay/legal case?

How do you get to the reputable source?

Do you go to the researcher direct to check in with them? How do find them in the first place?

How do you go direct to the journal where they published? Do you go direct to the printing press? Who do you trust when you are told that journal is reputable? Why should you trust them?

However you get to a 'reputable source' you are not going there directly whatever means you are using (unless perhaps you happened to live with the person who did the research?). You are going through layers of searches and your own selective filters to get to it.

That is inevitable. What is important then after finding the resource is to use methods to establish it's usefulness.

Anewerforest · 30/03/2026 20:39

FeyreArcheron · 22/03/2026 23:15

Well it’s often not correct

Quite . It's often completely wrong.
Also you could find the same information by googling, and make up your own mind about how to prioritise and arrange it. That is what studying is about. Not about getting to a simplistic solution as fast as possible.

ApriloNeil2026 · 30/03/2026 20:41

HelenaWilson · 30/03/2026 20:34

possible but then ive already used the eg make a list of essay titles for understanding the stock market 101, or the history of the cold war etc then i ask for advanced essay titles then expert level titles and so on

Or you could just refer to your university's reading list (assuming you are a university student) which will have been compiled by a real person with real knowledge of the subject.

Even if you're not a university student, universities have their reading lists online now. Here's one from Oxford Brookes University: Superpowers: an international history of the Cold War | Oxford Brookes Reading Lists

thats good but then id need a ranking by the professor on why each one is important and the main topics they dicuss before i then consider reading any

ApriloNeil2026 · 30/03/2026 20:41

Anewerforest · 30/03/2026 20:39

Quite . It's often completely wrong.
Also you could find the same information by googling, and make up your own mind about how to prioritise and arrange it. That is what studying is about. Not about getting to a simplistic solution as fast as possible.

but then why reinvent the wheel when ai can do it quicker for you ?

ApriloNeil2026 · 30/03/2026 20:44

can any one agree or disagree with this :

Strategic Importance Ranking of Core Cold War Texts

The Cambridge History of the Cold War: Volume 1 – Origins

Editors: Melvyn P. Leffler and Odd Arne Westad

Importance Score: 10 / 10

This volume is widely regarded as the definitive scholarly synthesis of Cold War origins. It integrates Western and Soviet archival sources and represents the work of multiple leading historians. For academic research, it is one of the most authoritative resources available.

The Cambridge History of the Cold War: Volume 2 – Crises and Détente

Importance Score: 10 / 10

Covers the operational heart of the Cold War: superpower crises, proxy wars, nuclear strategy, and the era of détente. It is critical for understanding how Cold War rivalry actually functioned on the geopolitical stage.

The Cambridge History of the Cold War: Volume 3 – Endings

Importance Score: 10 / 10

Provides the most comprehensive analysis of the structural and geopolitical collapse of the Soviet system and the final phase of Cold War competition.

A Constructed Peace: The Making of the European Settlement, 1945‑1963 – Marc Trachtenberg

Importance Score: 9 / 10

One of the most respected monographs on Cold War strategy. Trachtenberg demonstrates how the post-war European order was deliberately engineered through strategic compromise and alliance management, particularly around the German question.

For the Soul of Mankind – Melvyn P. Leffler

Importance Score: 9 / 10

A major interpretive work analyzing the strategic perceptions of both Washington and Moscow. It emphasizes security dilemmas and ideological competition rather than simplistic blame narratives.

Détente and Confrontation: American‑Soviet Relations from Nixon to Reagan – Raymond L. Garthoff

Importance Score: 8 / 10

An authoritative study of the late Cold War period, particularly arms control diplomacy, détente, and the return to confrontation in the early 1980s. Garthoff’s diplomatic background provides a valuable insider analytical perspective.

The Cold War – John Lewis Gaddis

Importance Score: 8 / 10

A concise synthesis by one of the most influential Cold War historians. It provides a clear strategic overview but lacks the depth and breadth of the Cambridge volumes.

America’s Cold War: The Politics of Insecurity – Campbell Craig and Fredrik Logevall

Importance Score: 7 / 10

Focuses on how domestic political culture shaped American Cold War policy. Important for understanding the political logic behind U.S. global strategy, though narrower in scope than broader histories.

The Cold War: A History – Martin Walker

Importance Score: 6 / 10

A readable early post-Cold War narrative written before the full opening of Soviet archives. Useful as a narrative overview but less analytically rigorous than later scholarship.

Anewerforest · 30/03/2026 20:51

ApriloNeil2026 · 30/03/2026 20:41

but then why reinvent the wheel when ai can do it quicker for you ?

You would not be reinventing the wheel so much as training and developing your own fabulous, creative human intelligence, rather than absorbing a set of phrases stuck together by a computer with no real intelligence behind them.

ApriloNeil2026 · 30/03/2026 20:52

Anewerforest · 30/03/2026 20:51

You would not be reinventing the wheel so much as training and developing your own fabulous, creative human intelligence, rather than absorbing a set of phrases stuck together by a computer with no real intelligence behind them.

but then thats like my mind randomly guessing what parts are important to study in any era etc

Anewerforest · 30/03/2026 20:53

ApriloNeil2026 · 30/03/2026 20:52

but then thats like my mind randomly guessing what parts are important to study in any era etc

Not randomly guessing! Developing your discernment.

ApriloNeil2026 · 30/03/2026 20:54

Anewerforest · 30/03/2026 20:53

Not randomly guessing! Developing your discernment.

true but then knowing whats immediately obvious, is not always obvious in my case

ApriloNeil2026 · 30/03/2026 20:55

im like a dog with a bone when its history

HelenaWilson · 30/03/2026 21:01

Do your own reading. Make up your own mind. Construct your own arguments as to why you think one aspect is more important than another. And be prepared to debate it with someone who disagrees with you. That's your job, as a student.

My A Level History teacher said you can say anything you like in History, as long as you can present evidence to back up what you are saying. If you can't find the evidence, that suggests your argument isn't valid. Other people may disagree, but that's what study and research is - argument, evidence, debate.

Anewerforest · 30/03/2026 21:02

ApriloNeil2026 · 30/03/2026 20:55

im like a dog with a bone when its history

Dogs with bones make great scholars!

ApriloNeil2026 · 30/03/2026 21:06

Anewerforest · 30/03/2026 21:02

Dogs with bones make great scholars!

not sure im that good, but im trying

suggestionsplease1 · 30/03/2026 21:12

Re: your first paragraph, isn't that what @ApriloNeil2026 is doing on this thread?

suggestionsplease1 · 30/03/2026 21:13

HelenaWilson · 30/03/2026 21:01

Do your own reading. Make up your own mind. Construct your own arguments as to why you think one aspect is more important than another. And be prepared to debate it with someone who disagrees with you. That's your job, as a student.

My A Level History teacher said you can say anything you like in History, as long as you can present evidence to back up what you are saying. If you can't find the evidence, that suggests your argument isn't valid. Other people may disagree, but that's what study and research is - argument, evidence, debate.

Sorry meant to quote this

ApriloNeil2026 · 30/03/2026 21:19

im not saying its perfect but using a combo of ai programs can improve learning

OchonAgusOchonOh · 30/03/2026 21:28

suggestionsplease1 · 30/03/2026 20:08

It's a shame you haven't addressed any of my points, why is that?

Because I missed your post.

I am not saying that AI should not be used or that it can not be a useful aid to work/learning etc. It can be, if used appropriately. I use it in some of the ways you are suggesting. I also get my students to use it in ways that encourage, rather than discourage, critical analysis and thinking. However, the vast majority of students who claim to be using to help learning are simply using it to replace learning. That is what I have a problem with.

Now I’m really out😁

Swipe left for the next trending thread