Can someone give some advice about the Cambridge and Oxford Foundation Year programmes?
To qualify for them you have to meet various markers of educational disruption or disadvantage such as low income or bereavement, which prevented you from applying to Oxbridge normally.
However, my question is: are these programmes just an easier way for disadvantaged yet talented students to be able to get into Oxbridge, so for example, if you missed school in Year 12 and so have low predicted grades, it’s an easier way of you getting in as otherwise your application may be uncompetitive (even if you are nonetheless capable of getting all As and A*s at the year)
Or, are these programmes about “bridging the gap”, meaning actually teaching students skills that they may not have to prepare them for degree study.
The reason why I ask is because I’m eligible for these programmes as I meet the criteria for eligibility and in my case, I underperformed in my A-levels getting ABB due to medical issues.
However, I’m retaking my exams this year and am predicted to achieve 3 A-stars in my exams. I don’t need the Foundation Years at Oxbridge in terms of development as I don’t need to be taught how to write good essays or how to critically analyse; I could definitely start undergraduate study next year or even this year if I hadn’t been ill during my exams.
I just thought it would be an “easier way in” for someone like me who has academic potential but was disadvantaged. This is as I wasn’t sure if Oxbridge accepted A-level resits. That being said, Oxbridge claim they are holistic and accept extenuating circumstances. So, it makes me wonder if the “bridging the gap” element is key for these programmes.