Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Education

Join the discussion on our Education forum.

To have though of a fairer way to fund state education than VAT on private?

605 replies

wlakaaf · 28/05/2024 17:33

State schools are in desperate need of funding.

Money needs raising.

Instead of sticking 20% onto private fees - when those people are already paying 100% of the costs for educating their child, how about this:

Parents of children currently in state schools ought to contribute to their education on a means tested basis. There would be no argument over means, it would be a simple reference to the council tax band of the house you live in. We have bands A-H. I would propose that people in band A-F pay nothing. People in band G pay a fixed charge per year and people in band H pay a higher fixed charge per year.

Keir Starmer has used money to buy a massively expensive house, worth in the region of £2m, in the very tight catchment of a lovely state primary. This is buying privilege, same as buying private education. So why does he get away without paying?

OP posts:
CandiedPrincess · 29/05/2024 06:40

Love how people think because you're a certain band Council Tax you are rich. My council tax is over £3k a year. I'm certainly not rich.

MrsMurphyIWish · 29/05/2024 06:45

LuluBlakey1 · 28/05/2024 21:24

Standards have not declined because of these policies.

They have declined because of decades of under-funding of Education in the 70s and 80s and early 90s by Thatcher and Major.

They have declined because of the state of school buildings- through underfunding and cancellation of Building Schools for the Future by Cameron.

They have declined because of the enforcement by Michael Gove of a ludicrous knowledge heavy, overly academic curriculum in all subjects, for all students, assessed by ridiculously complicated exams which overlay marking schemes based on skills and not the knowledge, whatever the ability and aptitude of the children.

They have declined because of the terrible situation schools find themselves in from an, imposed by this government, complex, unsuitable assessment system for SEN, where schools are forced to meet the needs of SEN children who require very specialist help that no longer exists on the necessary scale because of funding cuts by this government.

They have declined because it suited Tories to force the situation from 2010 onwards as State schools had begun to very successfully raise standards under the last Labour government by diversifying the curriculum to include significant numbers of vocational courses, and to allow children to sit the same GCSE courses that Independent school children sit. This Tory government immediately cut the numbers of vocational courses, changed the content and assessment of them and said the IGCSE courses used by Independent schools would no longer be allowed to count in Government Performance Tables for State schools.

State education in this country has been grossly underfunded for the last 14 years. The destruction of what had been built between 1996-2010 is disgraceful. Most children, as most attend State schools, are being horribly disadvantaged and that should not be allowed. No one should be able to gain advantage in education or healthcare by buying that advantage at the expense of others.

Edited

All this!

I know it’s derailing it it really fucks me off that indies can sit the IGCSE (my 100% core subject still has coursework in the IGCSE) but state schools can’t (well they can but it won’t count in tables. Another layer of privilege right there.

LuluBlakey1 · 29/05/2024 06:56

wlakaaf · 29/05/2024 01:46

The charity status isn’t fake if they satisfy the criteria.

Of course it's fake 😂😂😂

S33dHead · 29/05/2024 06:58

wlakaaf · 29/05/2024 01:46

The charity status isn’t fake if they satisfy the criteria.

Oh come on how can any private school be a charity!

crumblingschools · 29/05/2024 06:59

Even with VAT policy they are still going to be charities (their charitable status isn’t changing).

S0livagant · 29/05/2024 07:01

NeverDropYourMooncup · 28/05/2024 21:05

No thanks. My rented home is band G because it was built after a certain date and is wheelchair accessible. The huge Victorian villas opposite are Band C.

Just because it is wheelchair accessible? Mine's a B and only a decade or so old.

S33dHead · 29/05/2024 07:06

crumblingschools · 29/05/2024 06:59

Even with VAT policy they are still going to be charities (their charitable status isn’t changing).

Aware of that, absolutely didn’t make it right.

Churchview · 29/05/2024 07:08

chikachikaaaaa · 28/05/2024 23:01

Which he didn't anyway, not really. His school became private whilst he was there and he stayed (no cost). His parents certainly didn't chose to send him to private school.

Quite right.

Einwegflasche · 29/05/2024 07:18

wlakaaf · 28/05/2024 18:45

No, my choice was to pay 100% fees. Not 120% fees.

You've not been paying 100% fees, you are now going to be paying 100% fees if this is enacted.
The fees currently paid are subsidised because they are VAT free.

S33dHead · 29/05/2024 07:18

LuluBlakey1 · 28/05/2024 21:24

Standards have not declined because of these policies.

They have declined because of decades of under-funding of Education in the 70s and 80s and early 90s by Thatcher and Major.

They have declined because of the state of school buildings- through underfunding and cancellation of Building Schools for the Future by Cameron.

They have declined because of the enforcement by Michael Gove of a ludicrous knowledge heavy, overly academic curriculum in all subjects, for all students, assessed by ridiculously complicated exams which overlay marking schemes based on skills and not the knowledge, whatever the ability and aptitude of the children.

They have declined because of the terrible situation schools find themselves in from an, imposed by this government, complex, unsuitable assessment system for SEN, where schools are forced to meet the needs of SEN children who require very specialist help that no longer exists on the necessary scale because of funding cuts by this government.

They have declined because it suited Tories to force the situation from 2010 onwards as State schools had begun to very successfully raise standards under the last Labour government by diversifying the curriculum to include significant numbers of vocational courses, and to allow children to sit the same GCSE courses that Independent school children sit. This Tory government immediately cut the numbers of vocational courses, changed the content and assessment of them and said the IGCSE courses used by Independent schools would no longer be allowed to count in Government Performance Tables for State schools.

State education in this country has been grossly underfunded for the last 14 years. The destruction of what had been built between 1996-2010 is disgraceful. Most children, as most attend State schools, are being horribly disadvantaged and that should not be allowed. No one should be able to gain advantage in education or healthcare by buying that advantage at the expense of others.

Edited

This!!! I am sick and tired of privately educating parents on MN trashing state education and saying it’s not good enough for their children to justify not paying VAT. That the sector is shit. It isn’t and is doing a fantastic job in dire circumstances brought on by Tory governments.

I hope labour tackles some of this with other measures too and also starts to sort the inequalities in uni admisssons.

vapourtrail · 29/05/2024 07:28

Children who went to private school are five times as likely to end up in influential jobs than kids from state schools. You are not just buying them an education, but contacts and a path through life that is stacked in their favour. Private school kids dominate top jobs and positions of power and you want us to think of their education as a charity and help subsidise that....Er, no.

crumblingschools · 29/05/2024 07:32

@S33dHead but this policy isn’t going to help any of the current issues in state schools. Why aren’t voters talking about what is going to happen to state school funding etc, why is Labour and everyone else fixating on this policy. It’s going to do nothing to help state schools and nothing to stop inequalities

OMGsamesame · 29/05/2024 07:34

wlakaaf · 28/05/2024 18:24

His kids' primary has been described as a "prep".

By whom?

Bushmillsbabe · 29/05/2024 07:38

Why do bands A to F pay nothing?
We are band F and our house is worth nearly 1 million (we bought it for about 600,000, after doing up and making money on 2 successive doer uppers, no handouts just hard work) We are both nhs professionals (nurse and physio), apparently 'poorly paid needing food banks' if propaganda is to be believed.

We are committed to our daughters state school as are most parents from a wide range of economic backgrounds. And that is what makes a school thrive - a commitment by families to support it - some support with donations to PTA, some with their time. It's not particularly well off, with 20 children per class due to that being the number of children in the village and schools being paid per child. But the outcomes it acheives both academically and emotionally/socially are fantastic. You cannot buy these through throwing money at a school.

mileenderr · 29/05/2024 07:40

crumblingschools · 29/05/2024 07:32

@S33dHead but this policy isn’t going to help any of the current issues in state schools. Why aren’t voters talking about what is going to happen to state school funding etc, why is Labour and everyone else fixating on this policy. It’s going to do nothing to help state schools and nothing to stop inequalities

Stopping the VAT subsidy on private schools IS doing something about inequality though.

Ted27 · 29/05/2024 07:41

@wlakaaf

As you appear to have a bee in your bonnet about Keir Starmer and where he lives - out of curiosity, being London born, representing a London constituency, and prior to that having a London based job, where do you expect him to live ?
Would you be happier if he lived somewhere 'up North' with some ferrets in the back garden.
Not that I know him personally but as far as I'm aware he doesn't have other jobs outside of being an MP so won't have spare hundreds of thousands of pounds.

S33dHead · 29/05/2024 07:43

crumblingschools · 29/05/2024 07:32

@S33dHead but this policy isn’t going to help any of the current issues in state schools. Why aren’t voters talking about what is going to happen to state school funding etc, why is Labour and everyone else fixating on this policy. It’s going to do nothing to help state schools and nothing to stop inequalities

It’s a start( as they’ve said) and hopefully one of many. Tories have had 14 years and not made a start or even voiced concern.

crumblingschools · 29/05/2024 07:44

@mileenderr it’s not going to impact schools like Eton. Smaller private schools may go to the wall putting a number of people out of work. Parents from those schools will pay for tutors etc. And the policy is not targeting the issues in state schools.

mileenderr · 29/05/2024 07:44

Ted27 · 29/05/2024 07:41

@wlakaaf

As you appear to have a bee in your bonnet about Keir Starmer and where he lives - out of curiosity, being London born, representing a London constituency, and prior to that having a London based job, where do you expect him to live ?
Would you be happier if he lived somewhere 'up North' with some ferrets in the back garden.
Not that I know him personally but as far as I'm aware he doesn't have other jobs outside of being an MP so won't have spare hundreds of thousands of pounds.

I would also add to that - where do you expect him to send his kids to school? You have a problem with him choosing state primary on his doorstep.

crumblingschools · 29/05/2024 07:45

Sorting issues out in state schools should be much higher priority.

S33dHead · 29/05/2024 07:48

crumblingschools · 29/05/2024 07:44

@mileenderr it’s not going to impact schools like Eton. Smaller private schools may go to the wall putting a number of people out of work. Parents from those schools will pay for tutors etc. And the policy is not targeting the issues in state schools.

Parents in these schools are already paying for tutors. I have a friend who is a tutor and her biggest clientele are privately educated students.

mileenderr · 29/05/2024 07:48

crumblingschools · 29/05/2024 07:44

@mileenderr it’s not going to impact schools like Eton. Smaller private schools may go to the wall putting a number of people out of work. Parents from those schools will pay for tutors etc. And the policy is not targeting the issues in state schools.

Small private schools are also inaccessible to the majority of people - it's not just schools like Eton which perpetuate inequality. And nobody is saying VAT is a silver bullet which will solve all the issues with schools, but it's a step in the right direction.
And at the end of the day, there are the same amount of children which need educating, so not sure it will have a massive impact on the number of jobs in the sector overall.

cansu · 29/05/2024 07:50

Hmm. I think I would prefer that private schools pay tax like other businesses thanks. If private school parents think that is unfair they can send their kids to state schools. Birthrate is falling. We would be happy to have them. It would also help wealthy people to have more interest in education in the state sector which is a good thing.

S33dHead · 29/05/2024 07:52

crumblingschools · 29/05/2024 07:45

Sorting issues out in state schools should be much higher priority.

They will be. It’s a “start” and they quite rightly are focusing on the economy and other issues alongside first. Slow and cautious is fine by me.I for one am sick to death of Tory chaos,lies and ridiculous promises. Still waiting for the EU money to be flooding the NHS, boats to have been stopped….

NeverDropYourMooncup · 29/05/2024 07:53

S0livagant · 29/05/2024 07:01

Just because it is wheelchair accessible? Mine's a B and only a decade or so old.

Yup. I appealed against the banding (as it was new) when I moved in as there was no way on earth that a HA flatpack with a footprint smaller than my best mate's double garage would have sold for over three times the value of a five bedroom Victorian villa with driveway/large garden/etc. But they rejected it - I pay £350 a month CT whilst the houseowners opposite pay £175.