Following with interest to. We have a school locally that is a girls school, now looking to accep boys, which actually (despite the WhatsApp chat that loads of girls are looking to leave, as its not what they signed up for!), will be easier to accomplish than visa versa.
It seems there is a flurry of schools looking to go co-ed at the moment. I think they fall into one of two categories: Either (a) schools not doing well that need numbers generally (b) boys schools with the same issue, or those that have smelt the end of a boys only education.
Unlike 'girls only' schools, boys schools don't seem to have a fundamental argument anymore - at least one I don't hear.
Interestingly in this case, with it being a large boys school trying to take girls, the fact that people actively chose a girls education, for the obvious reasons, likely won't move or be swayed by this at all. I do wonder who in their right mind would send girls to a several hundred year old boys institution, hoping that the marketing has persuaded parents that they know anything about girls or how girls learn.
Don't get me wrong, I'm sure they have the money to build female changing rooms, etc. but I wouldn't send my daughter into a school like this, especially in the inaugural years, for love nor money. In fact, as someone who chose a girls education for my DD, if SHSK had been my school and it went co-ed, I would take her out. Too much change, too much disruption during a merger, and fundamentally not a girls' education any more.
The only entry point I see this working at for Abingdon, is sixth form, where strong, empowered young women, products of other independent schools or state schools, might move over for the co-ed experience?
Sorry, mind-dump over, I just find it really interesting and a real test of the 'girls only education' model!