Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Education

Join the discussion on our Education forum.

What percentage of children do 11+?

36 replies

frost8bite · 26/02/2024 19:29

DS is asking and I'm struggling to find an answer... anyone know?

OP posts:
Peakypolly · 27/02/2024 20:49

In Warwickshire 10% of pupils attend grammar schools. The proportion of children there having FSM is 3.2%, it is 17.4% across remaining state schools.
I've never looked for that statistic before and find it interesting.

fabio12 · 27/02/2024 21:06

Yes the FSM kids don't really get a look in because it's all through paid tutoring (last year Simon Langton's GCSE cohort had 5 FSM boys in the whole year) which is why Oxbridge supposedly choosing grammar schools over private and indies, which generally have more than 5 scholarship and bursary funded places per year, is a bit contentious.

Knit1Purl · 27/02/2024 21:38

fabio12 · 27/02/2024 21:06

Yes the FSM kids don't really get a look in because it's all through paid tutoring (last year Simon Langton's GCSE cohort had 5 FSM boys in the whole year) which is why Oxbridge supposedly choosing grammar schools over private and indies, which generally have more than 5 scholarship and bursary funded places per year, is a bit contentious.

In Gloucestershire, not sure if all but at least some of the Grammar schools reserve up to 30 places ie 20% for pupils who get the bsse pass mark and are in receipt of Pupil Premium. So that is definitely not aimed at the to tutored middle class.

Antelopevalleys · 27/02/2024 21:40

canttellyouwhereorwhatido · 26/02/2024 20:22

The idea of 'assessing kids of 11' into 'great' and 'also ran's is completely abhorrent . Particularly as these days it ENTIRELY depends on the money you have to live in a grammar school catchment (we did) and the MONEY to coach them for the exam (we also did) ... I mean HONESTLY, when it was a level playing field, no coaching, just everyone took the exam and the brightest got through - then hmmmm perhaps.. but now . NO WAY !

Grammar. School now is ENTIRELY the preserve of the wealthy who spend their money on houses in the 'right place' and tutors from the age of 7... instead of private school fees.

As it happens I let my eldest sit the exam which she passed. However there was no way she was going to go to the grammar because of my feelings about it. She went to the comp. Yes she went to Peterhouse, Cambridge. She got 'the big job in an investment house in the city.' As did many of her peers.

Why ? Because she is bright and her younger sister did the same .. her brother however was not as academic and has a fabulous trade which earns him more than both of them... without feeling 'less than'.

Making kids feel shit at 11 is outrageous and needs to stop !

How is it down to wealth? Aylesbury has a grammar school and it’s a dive 😅

canttellyouwhereorwhatido · 27/02/2024 21:45

Don't be naive.. everyone knows that to get 'the best schools' it's either pay private fees or get into a grammar catchment .. hence the MASSIVE hike in house prices. If your grammar is a 'dive' then it's unusual. !!

In Tunbridge Wells (our catchment) it is wall to wall Porche 4x4s and tutoring from before they can walk !

canttellyouwhereorwhatido · 27/02/2024 21:48

Nevertheless do you all really believe that kids should be sorted as 'bright' and 'not bright enough' at AGE 11 ??? If you do , then shame on you .

fabio12 · 27/02/2024 21:50

I'm sure every region is different with it's thresholds, but in most areas of the SE Grammar does tend to attract the wealthy middle classes (who often move to the area to avoid paying for private and forcing up house prices in catchment areas) who tutor and continue to do so through school.

canttellyouwhereorwhatido · 27/02/2024 22:02

How is it down to wealth ?

Could a single mother on benefits afford a private tutor ?

I will tell you a true story.

My eldest daughters best friend was the headmistress of an 'outstanding' primary... she was asked to be a 'super head' of her school and a failing primary.

In that school was a girl from a family of 7. With every deprivation you can conceive. Every sibling had a different dad except 2. No coats in winter.. no breakfast.. but she loved reading. And was really exceptional. My friend nurtured her, engaged with her social worker.. BUT when she reached 9 there was no money for tuition.. and the schools do not provide it.

Still she took the 11+... but not enough. She got 86% and the cut off was 87%..

So my lovely friend who knew this girl had done amazingly, lost her chance to get to grammar to another boy who (to quote) 'was no where near as bright but parents had the money to coach for the exam' ...

How is that right in anyone's world.

I reiterate. We should NOT be financing this travesty until it is based onGENUINE ability on a non monetary playing field.

canttellyouwhereorwhatido · 27/02/2024 22:02

*Best friends mother

Moglet4 · 28/02/2024 11:10

fabio12 · 27/02/2024 20:36

Not quite what you were asking but I read this yesterday so thought it might be interesting as a current news item https://www.kentonline.co.uk/kent/news/one-in-five-grammar-pupils-not-sitting-11-302416/

That’s a really positive article for once! Unfortunately, it doesn’t happen in Trafford which is more akin to The Hunger Games

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread