Currently looking at primary schools for our 3yo. She seems quite bright and we'd like her to have the chance to reach her potential and possibly get to a grammar for secondary (obvs we'd reassess closer to the time). Our local school is a lovely community school with lots of extra curricular stuff going on and good pastoral care. The SATs results are pretty crap though, at least partly because it's quite a transient population with lots of children who have English as an additional language, and also because they value welfare over exam results which is no bad thing of course. I don't think they have much capacity for stretching more able children though.
Anyway, one option would be to send her there and try to plug gaps/do stretching work with a tutor.
Other option would be to try our luck getting in to one of the "posher" schools slightly further away (20 mins walk in a direction unhelpful for commuting, which is quiet a big deal for London). They are really great schools both pastorally and academically, but it would mean that she didn't have many friends in the immediate area and play dates might be tricky (we don't have a car). She's an only child so the social side is important for her.
Back to the question: can tutoring really make up for going to a less academic school?
Thanks! And sorry for wittering - late night with DD and my brain is not fully in gear 🙃