We got offers from both Alleyns and Colfes yesterday and I’m torn. Son is quiet but loves sport, especially football but he’s no David Beckham. He plays rugby too and I’m aware Alleyns don’t. Whilst he’s bright, he’s not top of the class (aside from maths) and suffers from comparing himself to others all the time - he lacks self confidence in this regard. He really suffered from the stress of the 11+ process. However he is a brilliant kid - full of heart and kindness and thoughtfulness.
We live in Blackheath, walking distance to Colfe’s. But Alleyns was his favourite from the open days because he thought the sports facilities and programmes were better at Alleyn’s. Both of us liked both headteachers and their styles of leadership, though he probably preferred Jane Lunnon at Alleyn’s. Given his confidence issues, pastoral care and a nurturing environment are very important to me. The inclusive nature of Colfes really appealed to me.
I didn’t expect him to get Alleyn’s (nor did his prep school) and it’s given him a huge confidence boost to have received the offer. They noted in the offer letter that he did exceptionally well in maths, which is his strongest subject. If both schools were equidistant from us, I think I would choose Alleyns. So is the daily commute around the south circular worth it, given the type of boy my son is? Or are both schools much of a muchness for him and I should focus on the travel time? Alleyns parents on here talk positively about mixed abilities in the school but I’m worried he will go back to comparing himself negatively to others, though I guess that will happen wherever he is.
I’m quite torn on this, so all thoughts welcome.