@Onnabugeisha
^Generally, the US public education system is worse than the U.K. state system.
A few States, the public schools are as good as or better, but these are expensive areas to live: NY, CA, MA, PA for example. States to avoid are all the southern states and all the midwestern states. If you are in one of those states, look into tuition paying private schools.^
A general dismissal of all the public schools in a vast area of the US is what I'm looking at here. Do you see something else?
.....
Yes well, each state ranks and rates it’s own schools so of course every state has schools that are highly ranked and what not. But on average, these states’ public schools are below the national average and below the U.K. average state school.
Yes, there are variations within each state.
But keep on insisting that all US education is worse than all UK education and keep on including data on the US as a whole, and individual states, if, as it seems, you really want to fill your boots.
.....
Yes, I’ve generalised. Nothing wrong with that at all. And no, at an international British school you won’t say the pledge of allegiance because it’s not a US school and you also would not be taught a US curriculum either.
There is a problem with generalisation.
You yourself admit in your comment on SF schools that it's not useful.
So it's nothing but a cheap shot at education in America.
.....
So, she’s at a Chicago elementary school and is doing great, well I’m glad for her, but you have to realise that on average the schools in your State are worse than the average school in the U.K. In addition, there’s not much difference in primary vs elementary…the US really falls behind when the kids get to secondary.
My statement makes perfect sense in terms of US vs U.K. comparison as a whole. Just look at the OECD rankings. Your claim there’s no one system doesn’t matter really. It’s a bit like saying we should ignore the US rankings because it’s an average of 50 States plus PR and ignore the U.K. ranking because it’s an average of 4 countries.
No, you should recognise its irrelevance because you have already done so. The fact that there's no one system is the only important element here, and you have acknowledged that in your comment on SF schools.
Maybe you're not paying attention to what you're posting.
.....
I’ve never said it was a whole system. That’s an allegation you have made up.
You literally used the phrase Generally, the US public education system...
And what else should I use to back up the advice I gave if not current official statistics and ratings?
Individual stats from school districts would be really useful, and you have acknowledged exactly that with your comment on SF schools.
......
The pledge of allegiance wasn’t a stereotype, if you go back to my initial post, it’s what freaked out my British DCs when we lived in the US for four years. And, no the public schools sucked. Really sucked. It hurt my DCs education and I was that relieved when we got back.
That's an all around, generalised swipe at American education.
What specific school are you talking about here?
............
You’re changing goal posts. You cannot argue that actual national and international school performance data doesn’t exist and doesn’t say what you wish it said, so now you’re saying essentially why did I bring up all the US when the OP is going to San Fran.
Well, there is a simple explanation for that. My initial post was from before I clocked the OPs update as to where exactly she was going in the US. My next post, which is also the very next post in the thread talked specifically about schools in San Fran.
Yeah, I have a simple explanation for that too.
You are bigoted against all things American.
If you're not, then why did you bring up the entire US?
So you see, you didn’t need to do this long conversation about US schools in general, because I’d already posted about San Fran specifically.
You are the poster who posted a long diatribe against American schools. You have offered data from international tests to back up your contention that all American public schools suck, and you continue to state that, essentially contradicting yourself.
This whole conversation hasn’t been about you schooling me on how useless the data is for looking at San Fran because I obviously already knew that.
Yes the generalised data you posted is useless and irrelevant.
You have posted the glimmer of recognition that individual results may vary.
.....
If you don't understand how massively education varies by locality in the US then you really shouldn't be making such sweeping statements.
I do, but short of drilling down into cities and what not, there is nothing wrong with generalising at a regional level.
Huzzah!
You have realised that drilling down into individual cities 'and whatnot' you might find out (1) how averages are arrived at and (2) why averages at the state level and national level are not actually useful at all.
Averages won't tell you the national ranking of individual public schools, which is the only meaningful statistic anyone should use.