Hello
DD is due to start school in Sept and we have been visiting the primary schools in the local area. We narrowed it down to two and thought we had decided until now. The school we liked the best seemed fantastic in every sense and we were absolutely certain this was the right school for her. However the Ofsted report for 2001 said that compared to similar school it had a below average rating for progress. It did mention the school needed work on the outside play areas which was rectified in 2003 so maybe everything else has improved since then. The other school was fine but our gut feeling was it wasn't as good as the other one yet the Ofsted report in 1999 gave it A and B ratings which are well above average.
Do you think we should apply for the school we personally liked the best and risk below average performance in key subjects or do we send her to the school we liked, but not as much because of the performance tables?
We have to apply by next week so any feedback would be appreciated.
Thanks! xx