I'm a primary school teacher with a child in primary school too.
We (my school) have provided loads more learning opportunities than my child's school did - 3 videos a day, no worksheets (assumed children only had 4g on a mobile phone and a pencil, and we provided a workbook to be collected), newsletters, class book read to them and so on, but we've done very little in terms of feedback because we didn't have things set up for that until recently (like, 2 weeks ago). It's been VERY hard work, I've worked long hours and it feels as if I've been shouting into the void. Any parent I've phoned hasn't really wanted to speak to me.
Child's school had Google Classroom. One video the whole time, of all the teachers doing a dance thing, so nothing for learning. Direction towards White Rose and BBC Bitesize, but that was all. Not sure what they were doing with the rest of their time. They responded to any work put up on GC over about a week (3 different teachers), and my child was really excited to see the dance video.
Seeing this difference and reading lots of different experiences on here, it's made me realise that there are HUGE discrepancies in school provision. Not just this online stuff, but everything. It's partly about money, but also massively about individual teachers and their drive for whatever drives them. In my school we'd never have done videos had I not got on the case and learned how to do it the first weekend. We've done a newsletter that I'd not have thought of either, but someone else is running.
Heads really know their cohorts/communities too - those that don't will have struggled in this. I feel bad for new heads.
Also, MATs are good for children I think, but crap for teachers.