Various things that would be required to make me concerned.
Firstly, you'd need to convince me that IQ tests are a valid measure of intelligence, I don't think it's particularly controversial to suggest that they only measure a subset of intelligence and that test familiarity increases the score.
Secondly, you'd need to convince me that the groups taking the tests were equivalent, one thing we know about IQ tests is they tend to show white northern Europeans doing better, so I think I'd need to be convinced that the change in immigration of Norway over that time didn't impact it.
Thirdly, you'd need to convince me that the tests were equivalent, IQ tests change, and the raw scores need to be ever higher to get the same IQ score. If the tests are now testing different things, or the standardisation has changed so as the average Norwegian (who is not the average human) is disadvantaged in the testing.
Fourthly, you'd need to convince me that it was a genuine drop in intelligence, and not just a change in priority on what is learnt, IQ is a poor predictor of success because it only measures part of intelligence. What you need to be successful now is quite different intelligence to what you needed even thirty years ago, so perhaps the teaching has now focused on other things.
Fifthly, IQ tests are much more out of fashion now than they were, I don't know in Norway, but I can believe it's the same, so with no familiarity, people will score less.
So, no, I'm not worried that some Norwegian draftees are scoring less in an IQ test.