Illuminating document published recently by NASUWT (teachers' union) re the teachers' pay award 2018/2019. It obviously contains some criticism of the Government over school funding but the majority of criticism seems to be directed elsewhere.
The pdf document is called ^Where has all the money gone?
I had trouble copying extracts/linking so apologies if it comes out disjointed:
The funding which schools receive often does not reach the front line. Despite the school funding squeeze since 2010, much education spending still does not reach the front line. Substantial levels of unspent reserves, inefficient and wasteful school level procurement, together with excessive levels of academy trustee and CEO leadership pay, are now hardwired into the school system The NASUWT believes that there is need for urgent change in these areas, so that the available school and academy trust funding is used appropriately to support teachers to secure the best outcomes for all pupils.
Local authority maintained schools:
As of 31 March 2017, the total unspent balance across all local authority maintained schools was £1.7 billion. 2 The proportion of schools with a surplus was 90.0% on 31 March 2017.
The average surplus in each school with a surplus is £131,000.
The average surplus in each primary school with a surplus is £108,000 and the average surplus in each secondary school with a surplus is £373,000. For illustrative purposes, if the amount held in unspent balances in maintained schools in England is divided by the total number of teachers (in both maintained schools and academies), the unspent balance per teacher in England is £3,717. If the unspent reserve in the academy sector is taken into account in the calculation, the figure per teacher would be far higher.
For those schools which are in deficit, this does not necessarily mean that the school is experiencing funding difficulties Many schools experience short-term deficits because of increased pupil numbers which have led to greater expenditure to meet pupil needs. Funding for increased pupil numbers (known as ‘growth’ funding) is usually given to schools at least one year after the increase in pupil numbers has occurred.
Academy trusts:
In October 2017, the DfE published its first full Academy Schools Sector in England: Consolidated annual report and accounts. This confirmed the level of surpluses in academies:
The sector reported an operating surplus of £534 million for the year ended 31 August 2016. This represents an average operating surplus of approximately £90,000 for each individual academy school.
At 31 August 2016, 2,819 trusts had cumulative surpluses, with a total cumulative surplus of £2,287 million [i.e. £2.3 billion], 165 ATs had a cumulative deficit, with a total deficit figure of £50 million.
School spending issues are being exploited to justify the withholding of teachers’ pay, redundancies and the worsening of terms and conditions. Unfortunately, school funding issues are exploited to justify failing to use funding for teaching and learning purposes, including ensuring that teachers are appropriately paid
and have working conditions which support their key role and manage their workload. Inaccurate information about school funding, including fictitious school funding allocations, is circulating round the system, which is leading schools to believe that
they must cut expenditure on teaching and learning when this is unnecessary
The DfE, Education and Skills Funding Agency (EFSA) and local authorities must take responsibility for ensuring that schools are clear about the actual funding which they are receiving and will receive in the future.
Ill-judged research has also led some schools, MATs and employer organisations to claim that teachers’ pay and other teaching and learning expenditure is unaffordable
For example, the Education Policy Institute (EPI) published a report in March 2018 which claimed that schools could not afford the annual pay increase for teachers. The Report claimed that it would not be ‘feasible’ for schools to meet the cost of even a one per
cent pay award, despite 6.4 per cent of schools’ income being held in unspent balances by schools. The EPI Report is highly misleading The percentage of schools with deficit budgets rose by three per cent to ten per cent by March 2017, with a decrease in the average surplus by £11,000 to £131,000 for 90 per cent of schools. However, the EPI Report has drawn the conclusion that over 60 per cent of schools spent more than their income in 2016-17. No wonder the EPI has noted that the figures in their report differ from published statistics on school balances. Most importantly, the EPI Report has ignored the £2.3 billion held in reserves in the academy sector and has drawn its conclusions from research into a tiny fraction of the total 17,922 local authority maintained primary and secondary schools...'
OldBean2
How healthy is your contingency fund and what projects do you plan to spend the money on? Are your current pupils and staff suffering because the school is holding too much money in reserve?