Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Education

Join the discussion on our Education forum.

Easier to get Outstanding Ofsted with low PP, 'leafy' area etc....

5 replies

DizzyDandelion · 19/09/2017 06:48

www.tes.com/news/school-news/breaking-views/dear-ofsted-chiefplease-give-teachers-deprived-schools-credit-they

Read this and weep.
This unfortunately reflects many school judgements I am aware of.
When will Ofsted wake up?

OP posts:
Nuttynoo · 19/09/2017 06:59

Ofsted itself is meaningless tbh- because if a needs improvement school happens to be in a deprived Asian area, it's GCSE grades will often beat even top grammars.

BewilderedBeaver · 19/09/2017 07:06

Low pp, leafy schools are in my experience skint and desperately trying to make ends meet. Achieving outstanding without the money for decent resources has its own challenges.

DizzyDandelion · 19/09/2017 07:08

It becomes a virtuous circle for some 'Outstanding' schools. Get judgement and of course parents who care about such things will flock to the school. Engaged parents and easy to teach pupils.
Context is all and yet Ofsted seem blinkered...

OP posts:
DizzyDandelion · 19/09/2017 09:39

I’ve seen it also as an Ofsted inspector. I no longer have the heart to do it any more and so I gave up several years ago. I became entirely disillusioned even though I thought I was making a difference. You can read why Ofsted forced my hand here. But what used to frustrate me more than anything was having to be party to a decision to judge a "wealthy" school "outstanding" when I knew that some of the teachers in the school would never be able to cope in mine, as good as they might have been.

These teachers were fortunate. Their children turned up fed, watered, motivated, loved, cared for, with a head full of cultural experiences and a heart full of hope. On the whole, these teachers didn’t really have to worry about rates of progress for a dozen different ethnic groups, non-English speakers, SEND pupils, traveller families, 60 per cent-plus free school meals, low attainers, CP and Prevent referrals, persistent absence or a revolving door of new admissions due to high rates of pupil mobility. For them, it’s pretty much a case of boy/girl and that’s it. I can think of several "outstanding" schools I inspected where children did well not as a result of good teaching, but despite it.

From article...

OP posts:
dameofdilemma · 19/09/2017 11:17

I generally agree with the statements here though dd's (Ofsted outstanding) school doesn't fall into the stereotype being in an area with a high proportion of PP and a far higher than average number of pupils coming from non-English speaking homes.

It seems to have been granted OS status when it converted to an academy and was held up by Gove as a flagship academy school Hmm

Its a good school and dd's happy there but she watches more tv there than at home - its like any other state school with stretched resources and overworked teachers.
Also like many London schools it has to rely on a high proportion of NQ/junior teachers as anyone wanting to buy a home or start a family moves away.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page