Not sure how mad this idea is.
The more I read about SATs the more I feel that I don't want my DC to go through year 6 in a state school.
I am extremely dubious about my ability to pay school fees for the whole of secondary (and am not convinced that it would be the right choice anyway) but I could definitely afford one year. There is a good non-academically-selective private school that goes from age 7-18 about a 45 minute commute away and I think I could get a place for y6.
Fantasy scenario - possibly the school will be so wowed by what a delight he is to teach that we get some kind of partial bursary to stay on for secondary but I guess that is unlikely. More likely - I would run out of savings that could otherwise be used for university by y9 and then there would be no places left in the oversubscribed decent-ish state secondaries - so switching back to state for y7 would be the more sensible path.
But that would mean switching schools for one year then switching again. How traumatic would that be? Am I crazy to consider it?
My main issue is the utter waste of educational opportunity that goes with drilling children for a test for a year, coupled with a test that is badly conceived and tests ridiculous things, destroying love of learning and self confidence as it goes.
The school I am considering certainly doesn't let children coast or fail to put in effort. it does set regular assessments but these are low pressure and very unlike the SATs.