My DD has AP issues. She didn't fit into the 'classic' dyslexia mould and honestly we didn't understand why this bright articlate child was battling so much.
Eventually we discovered the AP issue through private assessment.
We found a system called FastForWord which retrains the the brain to hear the sounds correctly. It helped a lot. We also put her into a specialist school for a year where she learnt strategies to aide her and that she is completely normal. It was simply the teaching methods that were failing her not her ability.. We could not afford more than that 1 year. She will tell you it was the tipping point for her. And she would advise any dyslexic child that a special school for a short time is the best solution.
So basically we found that 18 months of intensive help in the right environment has made an incredible difference.
Dd has gone from low confidence, being at the bottom of the class to being on track for B's at Gcse. If she works she could get some A's. She is now at an enormous London State school and I have no concerns for her future.
Now obviously I realise that we cannot all do what we did. However it does make me think that the popular British philosphy of teaching everyone together in one environment, whilst allowing for differentiation, is fundamentally flawed and detrimental to dyslexic children.
Like many dyslexic children DD got no state help because she was not dyslexic enough... The provision and help in the state sector is simply not good enough and we are failing bright kids.
I also don't think the teachers can do any more. I do not understand who thinks a teacher can be expected to successfully cater for the needs if every child in a class regarless of ability during a single lesson and still expect every child to get the best education.
It seems delusional to me...