With all the publicity recently about parents being imprisoned if they don't send their children to scool ,it got me thinking about my situation.
Sure, if the school is supportive the child feels 'nurtured' -then great .....SEND YOUR CHILD TO SCHOOL......
However if (as in my case)....
He is Autistic (Asperger's)& ADHD and in a mainstream school without ANY support at all and as a result of this at the moment he rarely 'rememberss' to eat dinner (his Asperger's and his medication for ADHD affect his 'awareness of hunger' So i have asked for 'verbal promptss' to remind him to go to lunch- however he even needs somepone to remind him to get his lunch out of his bag and put it on the luch trolley- otherwise he will get to the hall and his lunch will still be at his class- so he then has to get it and in the short walk from A- B he will be distracted and forget about lunch.
So my point being- if i were 'paying' someone to care for him - I'd 'sack' them instantly if they didn't 'feed ' him- however in order to 'fit in with the law' i continue to send him to school with no guarantee he will be 'cared for'
So if i kept him home and was seen to be being 'obstructive' then i assume the LEA would send round their Ed Welfaree Officer (without me having to write a letter of concern- which is what they've said i have to do- and they will only visit me once they have talked to the school) and i would be able to voice my worriess.
This applies to many problems such as Bullying which is a problem that can affect any child- so If you decide to put your kids welfare first- where does that leave you other than in prison?