The thing is, if someone was honest and said 'my child isn't bright enough to get into the grammar schools or Exeter/Maynard and I don't want them to board, so Blundells is out, but I want them to have small class sizes and I can afford to pay so that's what I'm going to do and anyone who doesn't like it can contemplate the fact that my taxes are still paying for their kids' schooling at the same time as I pay for my own kids to go private, and be thankful for that at least' I'd respect that. I'd still think they were perhaps a bit snobby and not doing the best thing, possibly, educationally, but I'd respect the honesty
Is this what I miseed? Well, I didnt see it because Iwas busy posting .
So, you are saying, if I may be so un PC, that Stover has a pupil intake of mainly "thick" kids? You may well be right. Decent ordinary parents who care about their childrens education and whodidnt get their DC into grammar or selective schools do send their DC to Stover ( together with a few like me who do it for convenience). Whats wrong with that?
In the light of that then, their results are good.
I actually have a good friend with a daughter at Stover and that is EXACTLY her view of things. And I think - fair enough. Of course, she doesn't try and pretend that actually the school is the best school in Devon and the grammars are all lying about their results
I dont think I have said this, or anyone else on this thread. I have said pretty well what is above - given the non selective intake ) and much lower ability level intake) at Stover, their results are good. They teach " thick" kids well - and bright kids even better.
For you to try and comparethe results of Stover with selective schools like Exeter or the grammar schools is poor form. Its rather like comparing a local FE college with Oxford isnt it?