But duchesse what is to be done about this? The reality is that the economic sucking up of capital and big cities from rural areas is a global economic phenomenon. Perhaps we should be grateful we have a capital that is up there in the global rankings? If you feel badly done by try being one of the 100m rural migrants in China who have no rights, not to any schools, let alone good ones, or healthcare in the cities, and who leave their children with their grandparents and see them once a year if lucky. Often they are sending money home to pay for school, any sort of school, to give them chances they never had. I actually don't think you can regard it as an entirely London centric problem. Cities like Leeds, Birmingham, Manchester are also regenerating and providing opportunity and have brilliant schools.
To be honest when we returned from overseas what struck me about the UK was how entitled everyone felt and how miserable resentful and bitter it made them (especially manifested in the Daily Mail) It really isn't the way to make sure we succeed in the changing world economy. The ret of the world most definitely do not owe us a living.
Is London really sucking up public money out of all proportion to the money it generates for the economy, including, yes in the financial sector. Genuine question? I haven't seen any evidence to that effect. Initiatives like the London challenge were long overdue because inner city London schools had been allowed to sink so low in terms of funding and resources. It didn't cost a huge amount because the secrets of it's success, effective leadership and processes, sharing best practise are not expensive. Oxford and Cambridge colleges tell me they are impressed with the improvement in the way that candidates are equipped now both to get in and succeed when they arrive. And now what was learned is being rolled out to schools in the leafy provinces where you are right poor pupils are not now achieving the same outcomes as those in London. Good.