Enough is enough.
I've never seen so much vindictive tripe as on this particularly thread, particularly with the unjustified insinuation of the post today at 14:48:40
It would probably be useful to concentrate on the facts rather than hearsay and speculation.
TGS (the school not the nursery) was started in 2007 and therefore only this year can anyone who was there at the beginning have gone all the way through the school.
And there was only a "full" intake, around 20 children per year, from 2009.
Six children took the 11 plus this year and between them were offered 20 places (including scholarships) at some of the best secondary schools in the country, including City of London for Girls, Highgate and Channing. Being at a Montessori school doesn't seem to have been "a liability or closed doors" for them.
As with the children the teachers can only have been there a maximum of 6 and a half years.
The school has been physically developed over the years with a huge investment (£1.4m since opening across 3 phases completed in 2010).
Now for the perceptions:
Does TGS have a higher staff turnover than comparable inner city schools? Where are the figures? Knowing the school since 2009 I know that many of the key members of staff are still there.
Also consider the context. Montessori is relatively unknown in the UK so many of the Montessori qualified teachers are young, female and foreign born. This means that for many of them London is a stopping off point on their tour of life experiences.
Pupil turnover - again where are the figures? Yes children have left but the overwhelming number of leavers have actually left London, not gone to the local underwhelming state primaries. London is a transient location, parents get jobs all over the country and across the globe and when they return they get their children back into TGS.
Likewise the teachers and members of staff who return and recommend their friends to join TGS.
Parent Representation - on the one hand I read that the parents are such a dynamic, forthright and talented group but on the other hand note that they are unable, or unwilling, to organise themselves to approach the Principal. If things are that bad and the parents are that brilliant, why has nothing happened?
Where the mc professional background does come into its own is the ability to complain loudly and at length (if the cap fits ...) when they feel mistreated. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the admissions process. The waiting list for Foundation entry is huge, so that not all graduates from the TGS Nursery and siblings of existing children can always be accommodated. "Hell hath no fury like a hopeful TGS parent scorned". This is before "external" applicants push the ratio of applicants to places to 5:1. Amazing for a school with such shortcomings ....
It is thought that there are certain individuals who have made it their life's mission to undermine the work of TGS and have set up multiple accounts on social network forums to vent their spleen. Don't get taken in by these people.
No TGS isn't perfect by a long way but it's not nearly as bad as some (under all their aliases) would have you believe. Look at the facts, not the prejudices.
And finally, as for all the removed posts doesn't mn have a clear policy on what is acceptable or not? Even if anyone connected with the school complained surely mn would have consider such a request against its own code and not simply remove them without question?