I think we will send dd1 to our local primary school in September 2007. Me and my husband have looked around it and liked the HeadMistress and the school seems fine.
I haven't looked at any other schools. For awhile I thought about looking at one other which I'd overheard another mother, in the Pre-school collection queue, describe as better.
I decided not to visit and was happy with the decision we'd made. Just this morning I overheard a mother saying how 7 people in my local area had applied to a different smaller village school in the next village. I didn't find out if they had got places or not. Now I am left wondering what is so drastically wrong with the school we want to use, that so many people consider sending their children to the neighbouring village schools.
I have re-read the Ofsted reports of all 3 schools and our local school sounds all-round best although there is not a lot in it.
Is it people's snobbery making them look at other schools? The Ofsted report mentions that our local school hasor had travellers children and a proportion of children with SENs above the national average.Does that put people off? But it sounds like the school has excellent provision for children with special educational needs and pushes more able children along at their pace too.
How much attention do people pay to Ofsted reports? Could there be something else about the school that I don't know? Is it just that people associate early 1900s built small village schools as being better? The one we live close to is a larger school built in the 1960s.
Problems is, my dd1 goes to a Pre-school in another area. And all the local toddler groups in the area are church based ones so most of the people I've met will send their children to a church school in yet another village! So, I am finding it hard to meet local people (we moved last year) who might offer me some insight about the schools.
Should I believe what the Ofsted report says about this school?