I have a query - I have a child not due to start school until next year.
My DH and I have no immediate family other than our children.
Our family are split between NZ and Oz and we have not been able to afford to visit them for a long time.
I would probably look to take them to Australasia on an out of school to visit.
The thing is I remember growing up that when children in NZ needed to visit their relatives in Asia or the UK it was not a problem when it was due term time and was seen as educational.
I also remember it as a learning experience - so a friend who went to HK was always given work to do but then when she came back into class she would tell us something about HK and there would be a lesson on it.
It was a real thrill for me to be exposed to her culture by hearing about her visiting her grand mother etc etc.
I also think - because I have not lived in the UK all my life. That travelling in Europe is such a fantastic opportunity of learning.
I have also heard of a family in our neighbourhood and the only way they can afford to go on an overseas holiday is to do it outside school term time and they are going to somehow lie to do this?
I just can't really get my head around all this - if you as a parent make sure your kids keep up - then what really is the problem.
It just seems to me that it is hard enough for people out there and from my memories as a child I genuinely think I would have learned more if I had travelled more?
Looking back on my schooling I wish I had missed some classes and gone travelling - I mean you don't learn every day at school and variety is the spice of life.
Am I really bonkers to think this?