Hello,
I am trying to decide on a primary school for my child. I've only a few days to go before the deadline and can't decide as there are only two even worth considering in my area. I'm actually at the point where I'm thinking I'm not going to work, I'm going to stay home and home educate (other half doesn't quite know what to say to that.)
The only thing I actually care about is that she is encouraged and taught to acheive at or above the level expected of her, that they teach her to write well, properly comprehend and execute mathematics, give her the opportunity to develop independantly any particular talents she may have, and give her a sound general knowledge. In other words the basis to equip her for A*s at secondary then on to oxbridge or whatever she decides she wants to do if she has the ability, basically the whole point of going to school. Aside from the after school clubs on offer, music, languages etc, I'm not particularly interested in the airy fairy things like inclusivity and equality that the ofsted reports talk about as this seems rather fashionable and political to me.
School 1 has a good ofsted report (previously was only satisfactory)
School 2 is an infants school with an outstanding school report, which goes on to a good rated Junior school (also previously satisfactory).
However, there is a school outside of my area which has 100% of it's pupils achieving level 5 and above at their Ks2 Sats, and yet they are only ranked as Good! So I am starting to believe that ofsted is just political nonsense as surely the whole point of school is that it prepares your child for secondary by helping them achieve and reach their full academic potential.
Comparing School 1 to the infants school is difficult, the infants is outstanding but I can't find any formal league table of results to evidence this so how exactly does ofsted judge it is outstanding without formal examination to prove the teaching is really that excellent? After all, and ofsted report is only based on one day in the school every few years! Clearly the children that go on to the junior school are only achieving good grades once they get there...which are not so good as the grades of the children in school 1! There is also the problem that it is very unlikely that that we will be living in the area by the time my child leaves Year two so it feels like I'm stabbing around in the dark because I'm comparing the infants stage of two schools which have no empirical evidence available to judge how well my child will be taught.
Then there is the issue of after school care. My daughter attends the nursery that will provide her after school care if she continues to the attached school, she will have to go to a different nursery/childminder if she goes to the outstanding infants, not sure how I feel about this either.
Hard to compare open days as I was shown around the infants by a very persuasive head teacher and the primary (school 1) by a school secretary due to having to arrange it outside of the set open days. Very difficult to compare indeed, and I didn't get a 'this is the right school feeling' at all, not for either of them. If i had any choice at all i definitly would not want to send her to either of these schools! I would send her to the little rural school with 100% test results and class size of 10! But it's too far to travel.
Slight advantage of the infants is that they teach them robotics and computer programming at a basic level, however, how much of this do you think is just being talked up to impress at the open day, it may just be a bit of a gimick. Lol.
How did you guys decide! This is so difficult! I'm terrified I'm gonig to ruin my daughters life as once she's in it feels unfair to disrupt her and switch schools.