how long do you need to live at an address to be able to use it to apply for school admission?

[purplebox]

Just that really. Thinking of primary schools and moving to be in the catchment area of a good one, but I'm wondering how long you need to live in that address for it to be ok to use it? I will probably not be able to live long term in the catchment area I am thinking of.

Purple, I think you've been given an incredibly hard time. Especially as you are a "key worker", which means you probably work your bum off in a very important job that isn't particularly well paid, and I'm sorry to say, at times thankless.

As long as you actually LIVE in the rented flat, as opposed to using a postal address you'll be fine in London. There has been a lot of hysteria and more than a bit of pompous posturing about community on this thread.

I really wish you all the best in getting a good education for your DC.

Purple, think you are getting lots of flak more properly aimed at people who own a house and then rent an extra 1-bed flat for 6 months, which they never move into. Eg those who lie about where their current main address is. Which you are clearly not intending to do.

In fact the only difference I can see between you (given your comments in the thread) and someone ponying up an extra 150k to buy a permanent residence in a good school's catchment area is that they have more money? I'm a life long Londoner and people talking about "community" sounds like cant. I'm one of a very very few people who was raised in my current area and is now raising kids there. London is constantly in flux and that's a Good Thing.

Sometimes people in London try to corral off areas for them and PLUs ("people like us") - not a good thing for anyone in the long run. Luckily it tends not to work all that well most of the time.

If you can be bothered to put that much effort into getting into the "right" school catchment area then great. The irony is that if you care that much about your children's education they will probably be well served in any school that isn't absolutely rubbish!

Totally agree with the last two posts.

My cautions would be 1. make sure that the grass really is greener before you move 2. err on the side of caution re length of time at an address 3. remember that catchment areas in London can shrink dramatically year to year 4. do consider the potential travel etc

Best of luck.

Thank you for the replies. I do just want a good school, the problem is that a lot of schools in the areas I could afford to buy in have serious problems. The school I'm actually thinking of is the one I went to. I won't be staying where I am currently anyway, so am just hoping to move in a good catchment. Also my parents will live nearby and be able to help with pick ups etc.

It needs to be your permanent home. If you move into a house (rented or purchased), even if it is only a few weeks before the admissions deadline and it is your home, you will be fine. As others have said, it is fake 'homes' that cause an issue. If you need to move again after 12 months, that's fine.

TBH, I don't see this as any less deserving than all the families round by me who move into a two bedder (with sometimes a small converted third bedroom in the roofspace) in the catchement area of the two amazing local schools. Then move after child one gets in.

Do beware the practicalities if you think you will live far away long term. Things like school runs are only part of it. Parties, friends, etc will all require trekking back school-wards.

Some of the points made above are interesting. People in mc areas with good schools because of that mc intake unhappy that families who cannot afford to live in their area rent to get school places - while others think it is the affluent to move into school areas to steal school places. Eh? Also that there is an assumption that families move between LA boundaries so that moving within a council tax area is not acknowledged. In london population is so dense that you can be a fully paid up community member and just live too far from a good school serving that community. Finally there is the issue about how long a rental has to be, to be long term? Is 18months or 2 years still considered short? Frankly it is not at all as clear as most posters like to make out.....

As many have said, as long as it is your real home on the time of the critical dates of application and offer (check your LEA website for their requirements) then it is legitimate.

Shorthold tennancies are 6-12 months usually, so it is not in your power as a tennant anyway to be sure that you would be living there for longer (therefore it would be unreasonable for councils to expect this)

I think it's a bit ripe of people to get on their moral high horse that homeowners (who stand to benefit from the inflated asset values of their asset in the catchment) somehow are more deserving of a local school place than renters who do not have secure bling term tennancies.

Exactly, Himalaya. I was dancing around the point a bit in my earlier post - but there is an undercurrent in some of the preceding posts of "How dare you come on in the state schools belonging to those who have stumped up for a house locally!"

Which is just... a little confused, perhaps?

When it comes to education, lots of people are torn between two pretty basic urges: (1) not wanting to appear to be queue-jumping (2) wanting the best for their own kids. It's easy to end up doing the mental gymnastics to stick ones own actions on a pedestal, and put everyone else's choices on the naughty step.

So the person paying for private education makes snide remarks about local state schools. The affluent parent sticking with the local comp but paying for extra tuition gets very moralistic about the private school mob. The person owning a house in the catchment area slags off renters as non-communiry chancers. Etc etc etc.

Worth avoiding casting the first stone if you can but on occasion I'm as guilty as anyone else!

Oh well Merry Christmas everyone anyway

Yes! Love comments such as being able to afford catchment and did do to avoid school fees! Shame on those who didn't work had enough .....

Actually in some parts of London, people do the short term rental thing to get into desirable schools in less than desirable areas ( in their view) - its not that they can't afford to buy there, only that they don't want to

I know it's not OPs position, but there is in that situation an element of money b

Try again:

Actually in some parts of London, people do the short term rental thing to get into desirable schools in less than desirable areas ( in their view) - its not that they can't afford to buy there, only that they don't want to

I know it's not OPs position, but there are all sorts of permutations and all sorts of moral analyses
Why is it better to buy and move permanently than to rent short term?
In either case you are displacing someone else ....

Arkestra, so true! Really made me laugh! We're all parents trying to do the best for our children at the end of the day, no one can really judge but we all do, lol!!!

Pfffft

Not read all the posts but we faxed a copy of our signed rental lease to our school admissions officer. We faxed it in late June and the lease was starting on the 1st August for a September school start date. We were offered a place as soon as the admissions officer received our lease. I am not sure, but we had previously sent a letter of intention from our estate agent saying we were about to sign the lease and I think the admissions officer unofficially held a place for our child for a week or so until we sent the copy of the signed lease. We were coming from overseas and one of our DC's had already got a place in the school as there were vacancies. Our rental house was almost next door to the school. I had spent weeks phoning the admissions officer waiting for news of any possible spaces becoming available.