DS is 10, at prep school, just finished Y5. We are hoping to move him to a senior school in Y7 rather than Y9 (we have the choice) as we've had enough at the current school (nothing in particular, just enough after 6 years, new start and all that).
DS is bright, good at maths, etc., mildly autistic/aspergers.
Have just had him do a couple of 11+ English practice papers.
Paper 1 had an extract from The Phantom Tollbooth, which has lots of whimsical wordplay, and pretty much flummoxed him. E.g,, question "Study the world rigmarole. Why did the count pass the breadbasket when offering a rigmarole." No answer for that one.
"In the final sentence Milo wraps up in a napkin EVERYTHING HAPPENS FOR THE BEST. Explain why this is a half-baked idea." Answer: "This is because some of it is words, some baked thinga."
He did fine on the more formal aspects, grammar, etc., but the comprehension isn't there.
Second test was an extract about a child with blind parents, same problem, e.g., 'Explain what you think Etta meant by "I don't think seeing is knowing"' [extract from this paragraph]:
'I think seeing is so primitive. Even a dog and a cat can see. Knowing a personality and knowing how you speak and what you say and how you say it, I think that's more important than how people look. I don't think seeing is knowing'
His answer: 'Even blind people can do things.'
I scored him 1/12 and 2/12 for the comprehension exercises. Obviously he has more general problems with 'getting it', in terms of conversation/the world around him, so it's not strictly 'English'.
Clearly however it's problematic for school admissions.
Thoughts?