Leading on from another thread, I'm surprised how 'mechanically' writing is taught in the UK now. For instance ds1 did an exercise at school on descriptive writing as follows:
The alien flew through the galaxy.
The slimy alien flew through the galaxy.
The slimy, green alien flew through the galaxy.
The slimy, green alien zoomed through the galaxy.
The slimy, green alien zoomed quickly through the galaxy.
The slimy, green alien zoomed quickly through the galaxy on his mission to invade Earth.
The slimy, green alien zoomed quickly through the galaxy on his evil mission to invade Earth.
Well great, OK, it proves a point. But does it really work?
At our secondary school there is some fantastic English teaching, along these lines. Yet the children still mostly fail to put it into practice in their writing.
I make no claims to be a writer, and never will be, though I have done some editing. But this 'mechanical' approach to language drafting remains rather alien to me.
Ds1 (8) is a superb writer - absolutely stunning; but I think that's just partly a result of the vast amount of reading he does, and partly it's just a talent he has. I'm just not at all convinced by this analytical approach.
What do you think? Particularly the writers on here. How do you construct your writing? What do you do when re-drafting? What makes a good writer?