Hi
Im so glad I found this topic. We are currently based in Tokyo but may be moving back to London in a few months. I went to check out NLIS as it looked great from the website and the curriculum is fab. My first impression was that it was a little cramped - mind you at the time they were having renovation works done so a lot of stuff was all over the place. That aside, after talking with the lady, I found the curriculum was really enriching, very well rounded. 60% of local kids, 40% international.
Just today I went to a IB v English curriculum talk - it went through both curriculums, its pros and cons , it was very useful. The IB only started around 1968, so still pretty young in terms of education. The Primary Years Programme(which is what I am interested in) was established around 1997, so that is very young, although there are some fantastic things about it. What niggles me is that there is no external assessment of kids in IB curriculum until the actual IB diploma which is just before their university years. Up till that point, all assessments are internal and this, depending on the school could be very rigorous, or not. The problem then would be that if your child moved to a different IB school, there is no benchmark in terms of how your child is doing in relation to other kids - because each school sets its own levels of assessment etc. Also, IB works very well if there is investment in teacher training, and that is not govt funded. The Middle Years Programme is very well embedded and has a much stronger standing in comparison to the PYP. Univerisites recognise the IB, and currently 7% of all applications accepted in UK universities are from IB students. In comparison to A Levels, where there is a band e.g. A-C, Ib is done on a score out of a maximum of 45. So, eg. if your child were to go into medicine, he would require a score of at least 43/45 to be accepted.
Another point is that whilst the curriculum is very well rounded in terms of range of subjects etc, this may have an impact on the depth to which a subject is studied, the teaching hours put in, the interest of the student.
My main concern is the lack of 'official' assessments in the IB curriculum - how do you know how well your child is doing against all other kids in his age group if there is no external tests to check? Also how do I know that the schools are testing to the best of their ability, as all tests are in-house?
Im still very much interested in the school, but will be contacting them on their assessment process and how much of an investment they put into their teacher training.
Would be happy to hear your views!!