It's all a bit hypothetical ATM but I'd like to know what other MNers would do in this situation:
2 schools within half hour walking distance of home and each other. Both have excellent academic record but the co-ed one outperforms the girls' school. Both have good sports/music/art etc facilities. The co-ed one is 4x the size of the girls' school and has bigger class sizes.
A teacher who tutors pupils at the co-ed one says the teaching quality isn't actually v great but that they do well because it is selective. I get the impression the girls' school isn't so selective.
The co-ed's building is victorian and really not fit for the purposes of a modern school but it has been renovated as well as it could be. The facilities in the girls' school are a lot 'shinier'. The girls' school is c. £1-2k pa more expensive.
DS will go to the co-ed. DP wants DD to go to the girls' school. I used to agree because I believe that girls do best in single sex schools but now 2 things are swaying me. 1) the logistics 2) are we disadvantaging DD by not giving her the academic advantage DS will get by going to the more academic school? They are both smart and I expect them both to do well academically.
WWYD?